Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 008BC105D6 for ; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 01:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17468 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2014 01:43:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 17431 invoked by uid 500); 17 Oct 2014 01:43:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 17420 invoked by uid 99); 17 Oct 2014 01:43:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 01:43:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jacobb@cipafilter.com designates 209.85.215.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.42] (HELO mail-la0-f42.google.com) (209.85.215.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Oct 2014 01:43:09 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f42.google.com with SMTP id gf13so4283457lab.15 for ; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:43:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=SDwKmM4zMwC7wC5AnWw/ZflQiQvH30LoacvZUWPbf9g=; b=aaqfF9nnLMMdNjLVpJns880WcgN67Hs7KUo1MpZ/gaZq+Xhi+GuOWvaVXCWmtb4+dY 9/2356wiyL46TNiTjMfITiOXt/c3hHB24TooQxCUkrYOMoJyF1euwiLQWSGhLfY0thOx FT2NN7hcIjsFu39/ezOW6Bsc+i+vDyBP+j4Z7MOPXx7X/Aj7fDJly3Tx4uks8x/cgy58 GsMXfpKz/tfNdZ5++OazJhJALBJHUNuM0VnA1bIvCt9fRuDdvxTFhE4MM+GWS08dEb0T cm+GubPpS+i8ikbiabQrneuUDH5V8F5ZG2xt7hw5Y5H+kmoDJO4z4mtqCYCjYgVzBnHb 8mug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQldEuh/xx+P4gSUebebQ629dd0OiJmKt4jWHT/3bn7NNMH8mEka4V3WhNcyU0EuDN5wfGLG MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.156.168 with SMTP id wf8mr5409480lbb.28.1413510189027; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:43:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.148.65 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 18:43:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 20:43:09 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Distributed Testing with Multiple IPs per server From: Jacob Burkamper To: user@jmeter.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c33f6eb429e60505947cc6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a11c33f6eb429e60505947cc6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello! I am attempting to use jmeter to test a web service which will return differing results based on the IP address which sent the request, as well as potentially behave differently depending on the number of IP addresses active in the last few minutes. I have successfully used jmeter as a single client to simulate approximately 500 users, all with unique IP addresses. However, the single client is unable to scale any higher than this, and I need to be able to test with potentially thousands of users. Therefore, I have acquired more physical hardware, with the intent to use jmeter's distributed testing capability. The trouble I am having is that I can not seem to figure out how to have each individual server use a different IP list. What I would like is something like this: Server1 runs tests with 500 users, using IP addresses from the 10.1.0.0/16 range. Server2 runs tests with 500 users, using IP addresses from the 10.2.0.0/16 range. Server3 runs tests with 500 users, using IP addresses from the 10.3.0.0/16 range. All other parameters of the test remain the same. Is there some way to accomplish this, or to at least come close? --001a11c33f6eb429e60505947cc6--