Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E035017B58 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49810 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 20:12:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 49775 invoked by uid 500); 29 Oct 2014 20:12:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 49764 invoked by uid 99); 29 Oct 2014 20:12:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:12:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of philippe.mouawad@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.179 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.179] (HELO mail-ig0-f179.google.com) (209.85.213.179) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 20:12:46 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r10so3869912igi.6 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=c/do2Vg8/J9MCHvkxT2KOTO9RQEhQAttzSBGJGu7ok0=; b=o1pxDeAFQnK0R65HLPQpWf+PoMrThY3aG36xTDdzZ++tekyxNsj6Sg2SZVKK2HgUri ojTtN9EtXItDrSmBRMQfRY8uwkUKUKFdLrOpyWEkk2lcDWWRX32ySUeQlUJmeMSLy4NM IpzxwPdF+6x0/DTj0dsgIfUspJ4VzkHsGgaGF3grG7Fzs1YzkHv1vo3xLw28eptNfPhw 3OPu0UWAvpFzWSeFvOx5RhMiIV8gQktRrNgMrQkOVQVzVqOjO8f9C55SSKIrKcpWD/f1 hP4tiUJk5f0nZ8rMuIkK0FKHAe794vsCuLj7dBa1ZWtMJJ4w0TxPqfjQo6rNuBYSSzkm qZ3w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.28.14 with SMTP id x14mr15394760igg.39.1414613501198; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.42.102.131 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:11:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1414597805.46715.YahooMailBasic@web141006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1414597805.46715.YahooMailBasic@web141006.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 21:11:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JMETER performance - Processes & threads From: Philippe Mouawad To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01538e343bc71d0506955f5e X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01538e343bc71d0506955f5e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, What is your machine configuration ? What is your Xmx configuration ? How does your test look like ? Can you show an overview ? For how much time do you run it ? Do you run the 2nd test just after the first one ? Did you try reversing the test , ie run 2x50 before 1x100 ? What is your jmeter version ? Regards On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:50 PM, rxfillpharm wrote: > Hi, > I hope someone can clarify a jmeter performance question. > > I have a test that simulates user sign-ins. > > When I run jmeter in a unix process with 100 threads, the average speed is > 100sec. > > When I run 2 separate unix processes with 50 threads each, starting each > process within > 1 second of each other, the average speed is @ 30 secs. > > What is going on here? What is the bottleneck in the 100 thread process > that slows things down, and > is there any way to speed it up? > > Thank you. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. --089e01538e343bc71d0506955f5e--