Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C735710893 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:55:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 73998 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2014 16:55:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 73343 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2014 16:55:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 73334 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2014 16:55:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:55:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.176 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.128.176] (HELO mail-ve0-f176.google.com) (209.85.128.176) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:55:33 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f176.google.com with SMTP id cz12so3840448veb.7 for ; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:55:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lbIXXxgBpDSOecTSKC8oHlErfqDo5gopEotDVqC5vPM=; b=dn5bjBTlqsfU8zedx+QItAPeZcdnryBntaAo99GfIwQFiRZ4eFI7k+mSp1HTxB/h3u G6XMNsZKiplPBFdCqjAWWFXgA5/OKMRFALZxzengugY2BxDyz4sCpp6fibjwJkR2vSg2 U/I64dJusiwRS/CxNh4r3c/z0/PvSrra9qFHG9NcIPivhgA4tx8MmL8Rjm/4BP7Na9l/ 07+X1nEOkBbfsQJv2LnGBP+gW37AFnDbRa3mLF6Htaos9MrjS12/oDXpyPrf8ay2BhCd KvnfuVzG9O8dwsDUM1RD3bts6t8a5OmwUT/eNdkzTIgPPfG0QAz5nw/W+r4+rboLi0yw Q0FQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.212.200 with SMTP id nm8mr42194898vec.11.1395507311313; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:55:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.188.71 with HTTP; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:55:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 16:55:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance of JSR223 From: sebb To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 21 March 2014 12:47, sebb wrote: > On 21 March 2014 10:18, Ryabtsev Vladimir wrote: >> According to documentation, JSR223 sampler provides improved performance from compilation and caching in case scripting engine implements Compilable interface. The only language with this interface mentioned in documentation is Groovy. >> Do I understand right that JSR223/java is interpreted? > > Yes, they are all interpreted languages. > >> Will I get any performance improvement if I move from BeanShell sampler to JSR223/java sampler? > > No, because JRS223/java is implemented by BeanShell as you can > discover by creating a script containing an error. > > == > There ought to be a better way to discover what engine is associated > with each language name. Implemented >> ----- >> Vladimir Ryabtsev >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org