Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C5D3C10DA2 for ; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 32529 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2014 06:38:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 32510 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2014 06:38:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 32487 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2014 06:38:03 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:38:03 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of charan.sethi1@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 06:37:57 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wp4so1621398obc.11 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:37:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=5Z8UfwFL6K3zBWj3Hxz5mPTXhTrAISlh1AybA/QUbMo=; b=s8TgI9iMvme7uLGCb7Z8/YIj3CcPXfh3n29KXj8q1CoIQP8WGMzVzrYkFaQSsxVojI Na42dBpPSyjGewZaTiVQQZDs+luOZ2H5LxjKsQoOva+dkqZUzmwFZc/CD9y+bp9yBosv N2QgLC9En9MyaJypEzL6bu7yKyS9RU6sekYOTt05JcwmlM92O3OxaXPxMn8L4Ru+x902 iOL+FBNs/RXiwV7ZxOlTjV2z/TjLSHGlxIbPow0a6kGjwTglcQFkGJadnZCGo/Rf+uS/ qdHMwimiWJ0pQgHTa4ShxBWCyUWTtLDB5X8KjjpJyRUTr+T90ZvXfqavvWX76Wwe7Q+B TQQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.58.36 with SMTP id n4mr1362274oeq.51.1390459056344; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:37:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.228.195 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 22:37:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:07:36 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How to ensure the values i submitted with the request have saved in the required db table using jmeter? From: charan sethi To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01538baa20d30704f09d7a5f X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --089e01538baa20d30704f09d7a5f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 But i need to do this for concurrent 1000 users. How do i achieve this approach. How to extract the unique ID and Timestamp when i run 1000 users with a ramp up of 10 minutes. Can you please elaborate a little. On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, NaveenKumar Namachivayam < catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote: > After the execution is done, you can query the details from the database, > instead of adding JDBC step in your test plan. > > I hope each payment will have an unique id. Before run your test note down > the latest ID and its timestamp. After the run again note down the values. > So that you can find the difference. > > I feel this is better approach. Thanks! > > NaveenKumar N > Excellent Jmeter Training. Register www.QAInsights.com/services > > > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:27 AM, charan sethi >wrote: > > > I want to check if 1000 concurrent users log in a website within a > > specified period of time and register and provide payment details then > for > > every User i wanna check the details submitted in the database are > > accurate for each user. > > > > Is it possible that i can add a JDBC request which can provide me the > > details for every user immediately after the registeration for the user > is > > complete. > > > > I know this would increase my response time but that is not an issue for > > us. > > > > I need to do a functional test where if 1000 users register than for all > > these users accurate details get stored. the criteria is to ensure that > if > > concurrent registerations take place the data for users is accurate and > > information does not get mixed up for the users if they access the site > > concurrently under load. > > > > Is there any other better approach of doing this with jmeter? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > -- > Thank you, > > Regards, > NaveenKumar N > Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com and www.MyTechCube.com > --089e01538baa20d30704f09d7a5f--