Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E900B10C2B for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 86554 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2013 17:51:03 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 86107 invoked by uid 500); 22 Oct 2013 17:51:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 86098 invoked by uid 99); 22 Oct 2013 17:51:01 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:51:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shettyd@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.169] (HELO mail-we0-f169.google.com) (74.125.82.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:50:56 +0000 Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id q58so8632733wes.14 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=41NaAJNffo+7NsJNpdXJQe/sEgQ0Y9LChmw4Ttbm7E0=; b=R8AYDogYu2LCZp6m20Y9N51kysqiwnof9EaaJ7Nwgcq7EhfKKpsWs39Qft6Z22vPLF bliGFfvEd1wAs4HsRU6qmB5qKyqomrnld5Lu6V/8SOliFhuSxDjBi8pnAdhS7fv1fMpC nByyDMAarMzEMh/+sFcowiNGCm3tZMUKbJN72OJPaTLcdIxYs3Cnh6Vrk0x6N2KUeLzx Esavi3298fxDcVr7Up/ORnqxN/TU0k+wm8jpVSBkZjk/H6nWoJDAVCjAVHwYttSEo3pB ZG3ij2UNx7Q6GXNg2Ce/N/vufNB6yNn7zWbn1IGfeKB0qQld07xwwlCp4MLM6YoXjf63 rycA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.198.77 with SMTP id ja13mr15953077wic.34.1382464235220; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.242.105 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:50:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <17defb0c.fabc.141dee1c888.Coremail.13651877684@163.com> References: <3ac263c2.d7a8.141de1ca744.Coremail.13651877684@163.com> <17defb0c.fabc.141dee1c888.Coremail.13651877684@163.com> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2013 10:50:35 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: load balance through port number From: Deepak Shetty To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b604a68a7b2bb04e95809ca X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --047d7b604a68a7b2bb04e95809ca Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable dont you have a load balancer in front? On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 11:37 PM, =E9=BB=84=E5=90=89=E6=B5=A9 <13651877684@= 163.com> wrote: > hi, > > there's a application, which was deployed in a machine, in 2 weblogic > server, each listen at different port number. > > so, I want to generate load to the application's 2 port number euqally. I= s > there any good idea? --047d7b604a68a7b2bb04e95809ca--