Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6459AFF3D for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99300 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2013 08:48:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 99134 invoked by uid 500); 3 Apr 2013 08:48:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 99113 invoked by uid 99); 3 Apr 2013 08:48:42 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:48:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [213.140.208.230] (HELO spam-fw.nic-west.cy.cablenet-as.net) (213.140.208.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:48:36 +0000 X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1364978893-05686c1172eaf90001-40sO2q Received: from kostas.localnet ([164.215.21.77]) by spam-fw.nic-west.cy.cablenet-as.net with ESMTP id DLUC9s2VvsoqX6Pl; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 11:48:13 +0300 (EEST) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: kostas@methodosit.com.cy X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 164.215.21.77 From: Kostas Papadopoulos To: user@jmeter.apache.org Subject: GUI getting slower? Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 11:48:13 +0300 X-ASG-Orig-Subj: GUI getting slower? User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.1; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201304031148.13356.kostas@methodosit.com.cy> X-Barracuda-Connect: UNKNOWN[164.215.21.77] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1364978893 X-Barracuda-URL: http://213.140.208.230:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at cy.cablenet-as.net X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=9.0 tests=BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.2.127041 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 BSF_SC0_MISMATCH_TO Envelope rcpt doesn't match header X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org We have been using JMeter version 2.5 to do some performance testing. I recently installed JMeter version 2.9 and I found that the test results for the same tests are very different when using the GUI. In one instance, the same test gives throughput 4500/sec with version 2.5 and 3800/sec with 2.9. Running non-gui on both versions gives comparable results (within 2%). I'm running these tests on the same exact environment for both version (same machines, application to be tested, java version, database, data, etc.) Is this to be expected? Is the recommended practise to run only non-gui? Or is it something to be looked at more carefully? Please excuse me if this has this been addressed before. -- Best Regards Kostas Papadopoulos K.E MethodosIT Ltd Tel: +357 22463610 Fax: +357 22515197 Website: http://www.methodosit.com.cy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org