Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA9099A8F for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58513 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 16:55:26 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 58477 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 16:55:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 58463 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2012 16:55:26 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:55:26 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FSL_RCVD_USER,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rwilson2@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.171] (HELO mail-ob0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:55:19 +0000 Received: by obqv19 with SMTP id v19so2639286obq.2 for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:54:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=ZlVWn06Az/ZvBMcRdJskzjt9X+jesnsUVQ2xVrxAv8A=; b=XUcgqqdckc4jD/Lhrwfh98s8vVGvE0E8AEoVBHsiP5DxcXxGN1HwqwZdjSspu8nhhY rZrJkRtVF9W7e91VYLtNfmksKK9dT93e7BTDpnvs+oiOkv2vON5WgCCxtScr5/M0o1Hb /0wz2M5DLMGD8mQ42jBAxTdX/W1lFAgTeKG5lnO3AyAMUu3LyNmitj645xNNV61h89T6 +jfHOvtSwwzUft3q1fslgVdcS+VoC5nonjELUlq/c2ryweUCIEveeXcmYlfFGxc6jcLP HWMdJ/pgrkMgZRJM8cG3bKrKRb0lW4ql2zimgDrOMfEZPn7tFOeaP7gJgEd3Bf3FLN60 X7eA== Received: by 10.182.0.13 with SMTP id 13mr2264435oba.55.1342630498125; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:54:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elijah ([168.215.170.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm11379937oef.6.2012.07.18.09.54.56 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:54:57 -0700 (PDT) From: "Robin D. Wilson" To: "'JMeter Users List'" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: Bad Throughput with Preprocessor Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:54:56 -0500 Message-ID: <007201cd6506$0fe57ec0$2fb07c40$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 thread-index: AQMBF6v+9/0pivza6n2fuRM3+8uI55TH3Ivw Content-language: en-us X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Does it matter which preprocessor you use? I use the User Parameters preprocessor (a lot), and I haven't noticed this. -- Robin D. Wilson Sr. Director of Web Development KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. VOICE: 512-777-1861 www.KingsIsle.com -----Original Message----- From: unjc email [mailto:unjc.email@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 11:09 AM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Bad Throughput with Preprocessor Hello all, I want to test with dynamic-generated Url. I found there is a huge drop in throughput when I use preprocessor (even an empty preprocessor) for the HTTP sampler. The difference is as much as ten times in my test. Do any of you have any suggestion what to use if I have to implement some logics for the sampler? Any advice will be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Jacky --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org