jmeter-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: JMS Publisher test versus IBM Performance Harness for Java Message Service
Date Sun, 26 Feb 2012 13:45:59 GMT
Can you create a Bugzilla and attach your test case ?

Thanks
Regards
Philippe

On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Bruno Antunes
<bruno.fs.antunes@gmail.com>wrote:

> Just one correction. Test period was 60 seconds (one minute)
>
> regards,
> --
> Bruno Antunes
> Software Engineer
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Bruno Antunes
> <bruno.fs.antunes@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > I have performed a very simple test, using JMS Publisher sampler on
> > JMeter, and a "jms.r11.Sender" test case on Harness , with similar  test
> > conditions:
> > * No ramp-up, only one thread
> > * same message size (1000 bytes)
> > * same destination queue
> > * same duration test period (60 minutes)
> > * running as fast as possible (no delay between samples)
> >
> > From this tests, I observe that Harness generates almost 90% more
> messages
> > than JMeter. As such we achieve greater throughput with one thread in a
> one
> > minute test using Harness
> >
> > In order to get same throughput for jmeter, we must configure more
> threads.
> >
> > Tested with JMeter 2.6, and  IBM Performance Harness for Java Message
> > Service 1.2 (
> >
> https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/community/groups/service/html/communityview?communityUuid=1c020fe8-4efb-4d70-afb7-0f561120c2aa
> > )
> >
> > Any ideas of why JMeter generates much less load? I have even run jmeter
> > with no gui, and saves results in CSV format.
> >
> > --
> > Bruno Antunes
> > Software Engineer
> >
>



-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message