Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A91497FB8 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:47:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 48641 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2011 19:47:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-user-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 48607 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2011 19:47:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list user@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 48598 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2011 19:47:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:47:10 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rwilson2@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.171] (HELO mail-yx0-f171.google.com) (209.85.213.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:47:03 +0000 Received: by yenl7 with SMTP id l7so3325408yen.2 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:46:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:thread-index :content-language; bh=oy+Nqdaun2dgdU9tc/yFlSqJ0HDE8P+6l2skWTZU+Gc=; b=M6e3bZz970QJXXo7XOyUAI45gciLyNh7TR3jX3TSqZHJbBOSNPfIlVihTME20nnsZZ WGQkByVGERStUOcBkekndX0rtbTh1lGgj6VbmCBbvY0I+GXFu4vJgpUfjB2AeJCPux58 yeS7hLmtJkvHh7NcGVBAn1CSk+gnHEtCAkoPc= Received: by 10.101.11.18 with SMTP id o18mr8643709ani.86.1321386402820; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:46:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from elijah ([168.215.170.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u19sm76909925ank.11.2011.11.15.11.46.41 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 15 Nov 2011 11:46:41 -0800 (PST) From: "Robin D. Wilson" To: "'JMeter Users List'" References: <1321368289792-4994460.post@n5.nabble.com> <1321369706397-4994555.post@n5.nabble.com> <003901cca3af$6b3bb0a0$41b311e0$@gmail.com> <004901cca3bb$6890e580$39b2b080$@gmail.com> <008001cca3c9$7fc0af70$7f420e50$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: JMeter reporting higher response times Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 13:46:40 -0600 Message-ID: <009d01cca3cf$4c3c9be0$e4b5d3a0$@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQJWY0FcVvRf/p5RoXvIpJKrRZ5gsgMtFTxvAXMkm7sCn+nSJwJRizwLAS5ksZcCBBuiRgG58WxYAj3qOTyUFPeW8A== Content-Language: en-us The server does use compression. I'm trying to get the nightly build now - I'll let you know the = difference. -- Robin D. Wilson Sr. Director of Web Development KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. VOICE: 512-777-1861 www.KingsIsle.com -----Original Message----- From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]=20 Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 1:27 PM To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: JMeter reporting higher response times On 15 November 2011 19:05, Robin D. Wilson wrote: > Images: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0JMeter 2.4 snap: http://tinypic.com/r/xo0hfd/5 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0JMeter 2.5.1 snap: http://tinypic.com/r/qn045e/5 The byte sizes are very different also; larger for 2.4. That is probably due to compression - previously JMeter recorded the uncompressed size, now it records the transmitted (compressed) size. Does the server use compression? > I'm using HTTPS. > > The POST takes longer, the GET does not. (In the images, the=20 > "Homepage" is a GET, the "Login" is a POST.) > > Do I have to build JMeter to get the fixed HTTP client, or is there=20 > somewhere that I can get it already ready to go (for Windows XP,=20 > 32bit, Java JRE1.6.0_29)? Follow the nightly build links. > I consider myself a medium to advanced "user" of JMeter, but I'm not=20 > really a developer (of any kind, anymore)... > > -- > Robin D. Wilson > Sr. Director of Web Development > KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. > VOICE: 512-777-1861 > www.KingsIsle.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 11:38 AM > To: JMeter Users List > Subject: Re: JMeter reporting higher response times > > On 15 November 2011 17:24, Robin D. Wilson wrote: >> Hopefully this list can handle images... > > No, it cannot. > > Use a public hosting service and include the URL in the e-mail. > >> I have included a couple screen snaps of what I'm seeing. I ran a=20 >> test that requests (GET) the 'homepage' from our test machine. Then=20 >> it POSTs a login (username + password + special token) to the login = form. >> It is a very simplified test. >> >> When I run it on JMeter 2.4, I get throughput of 128.1. When I run it = >> on JMeter 2.5.1 I get throughput of 79.5. >> >> The request averages show similar differences: >> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0JMeter 2.4 - average times are 744ms >> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0JMeter 2.5.1 - average times are 901ms >> >> Re-running the tests over and over give very similar results (there's = >> some variability in the response times of the server, so I had to run = >> this a bunch of times to be sure that I wasn't just seeing an = anomaly. >> The results are consistent - each test run shows JMeter 2.4 running=20 >> significantly faster than JMeter 2.5.1. > > Do you use HTTP or HTTPS? > > Do both GET and POST show elapsed time increases? > >> BTW, just now, when I tried to switch this test to use the HTTP4=20 >> client, the cookies stopped working correctly. So I couldn't test=20 >> that sampler. The above numbers are just for the HTTP3.1 client. I=20 >> have a cookie value called 'stk', and using the "${COOKIE_stk}"=20 >> variable in the POST fails about 90% of the time when I'm using the=20 >> HTTP4 client. It > works fine with HTTP3.1. > > There have been some fixes to HC4 since 2.5.1. > >> -- >> Robin D. Wilson >> Sr. Director of Web Development >> KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. >> VOICE: 512-777-1861 >> www.KingsIsle.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:09 AM >> To: JMeter Users List >> Subject: Re: JMeter reporting higher response times >> >> On 15 November 2011 15:58, Robin D. Wilson = wrote: >>> Not sure if this will matter, but have you tried testing this in=20 >>> JMeter 2.4.x? >>> >>> The reason I ask is that I have a bunch of test scripts that I=20 >>> regularly run in 2.4 r961953, and I have seen a significant decrease = >>> in performance of these same test scripts (both unmodified, and=20 >>> switching to various flavors of the new HTTP Sampler) when I=20 >>> switched to >> 2.5 and 2.5.1. >> >> Can you provide details of these issues please? >> >>> -- >>> Robin D. Wilson >>> Sr. Director of Web Development >>> KingsIsle Entertainment, Inc. >>> VOICE: 512-777-1861 >>> www.KingsIsle.com >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: sasidharsmit [mailto:sasidharsmit@gmail.com] >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 9:08 AM >>> To: jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: JMeter reporting higher response times >>> >>> I disabled everything other than the actual sampler. Still, the=20 >>> response time is over 2000 ms. PF attached the screenshot. >>> >>> = http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/file/n4994555/jmeter_only_sampler. >>> p >>> ng >>> jmeter_only_sampler.png >>> >>> Regards, >>> Sasidhar Sekar >>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/JMeter-reporting-higher-response- >>> t >>> i >>> mes-tp >>> 4994460p4994555.html >>> Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org >>> >>> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org >>> >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@jmeter.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@jmeter.apache.org