Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" <jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted
 nor denied by domain of kootsoop@gmail.com)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:56:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: kootsoop <kootsoop@gmail.com>
To: jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org
Message-ID: <1316645765536-4828222.post@n5.nabble.com>
In-Reply-To: <1316628868074-4827319.post@n5.nabble.com>
References: <4E2D88FA.9090900@gmail.com>
 <1316535562299-4823146.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAOGo0VbCPUzp4WtOQUDP+2=kPAnhPK8gmN_y57Xa8fb=WH6n-g@mail.gmail.com>
 <1316546024995-4823652.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <1316549536808-4823875.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <CAH9fUpYwE3_ck9Ebxmc0qBrg5dvNH9YGutMxn50uqSYUL_u5aw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CANP2Lp6GcxujM_5LOty-LRh6XCG9Ze6potzXYOvmV9YOJ_54EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1316610468263-4826253.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <1316611472710-4826314.post@n5.nabble.com>
 <1316628868074-4827319.post@n5.nabble.com>
Subject: Re: Jmeter Performance using, jmeter-server VS running in the local
 instance
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


Oliver Lloyd wrote:
> 
> Ah, that's different. It's true (or at least I have experienced the same
> thing) that if you have JMeter running in Distributed (master_slave) mode
> then you can potentially hit an IO bottleneck where JMeter cannot write
> multiple results streams to one file quick enough. The workaround - as you
> have already seen - is to run multiple instances in isolation and then
> append all the results together (and then sort them). Personally, I do
> this all the time - I have it as a habit.
> 

Thanks, that definitely makes sense of what I am seeing and gives me the way
forward.  I've been running three clients on separate machines from the
command line now, just dumping to a JTL file.  Then loading it up in a GUI
client to collate the results afterwards.  That gives me what I need.


> PS. That is all independent of using the CTT. That's just useful for
> creating repeatability / reaching a defined load. etc.
> 

Understood. I'll see what I can do to use the CTT as a baseline "selectable"
load that other tests can run on top of.

Thanks again for the feedback!

--
View this message in context: http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Jmeter-Performance-using-jmeter-server-VS-running-in-the-local-instance-tp4631144p4828222.html
Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org