Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03FFF6B8B for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:42:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 8617 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2011 03:42:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8321 invoked by uid 500); 21 Jul 2011 03:41:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "JMeter Users List" Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 8310 invoked by uid 99); 21 Jul 2011 03:41:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:41:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of andrejvanderzee@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.44] (HELO mail-yw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.213.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 21 Jul 2011 03:41:43 +0000 Received: by ywp31 with SMTP id 31so467456ywp.31 for ; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:41:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=4YlROTjf1pAUTSPGxssGeewLVl8lhhdcIQfwBwVZBbE=; b=eG59YWMptNht0PVpATHyruABkXrthgB1cQPuxIsw8o4WvzQ4nKWorFor2SFBLvpFE5 CmdastwUcQZ7uw2QzOWteIf1ziO6gvN9gpSEBAAhuibKvaBIwDQxB6Hl45FnPs1Xs+iV xJ1AgTgmGCzBmlimWsVX9lczGDNeqTgSmJC3w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.164.38 with SMTP id r38mr99361ago.117.1311219682742; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.117.170 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 20:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 05:41:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: throughput: transactions vs samplers From: Andrej van der Zee To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, Recently I have been using the Throughput Controller together with the Constant Throughput Timer (native) and Throughput Shaping Timer (from JMeter Plugin). I became to understand that the throughput values specified in the timers do not reflect transactions per second, but rather samplers per second. This led me to a rather crucial problem for my test plan, but maybe I am mistaking. Hopefully somebody can help me out here. Consider the following test plan: --> Thread Group ----> Constant Throughput Timer ----> Transaction Controller (options: generate parent sample, do NOT include timer duration) ------> HTTP Request Sampler 1 ------> HTTP Request Sampler 2 I have a listener that records the response time of the Transaction Controller. Sometimes I see high values that look suspicious to me. Now I became to think that if a thread just executed HTTP Request Sampler 1, it might be paused to satisfy the specified throughput. Then after it is resumed and executed HTTP Request Sampler 2, the paused time is included in the response time of the Transaction Controller as a whole. I was hoping that somebody could confirm that threads may be paused between samplers in a transactions in this particular setup, or are only paused after the thread finished its iteration (this was my initial assumption). Thank you! Andrej --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org