Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 18033 invoked from network); 31 Aug 2010 17:20:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Aug 2010 17:20:25 -0000 Received: (qmail 62180 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 17:20:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62127 invoked by uid 500); 31 Aug 2010 17:20:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "JMeter Users List" Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 62119 invoked by uid 99); 31 Aug 2010 17:20:24 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:20:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of deicool@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:20:20 +0000 Received: by wwb28 with SMTP id 28so1067157wwb.13 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:19:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hts7YskN5CauGFIh+CC9xBbtRQVpZ/InPhyjoAf4jMc=; b=A+ltaKPyGYy28jLfyTj0Dh2sH6LFj5yZ1Cs3shv4CYi1soHMbINmG/6Nz5nUphSX9L 8b/CCarspRoEu6XQS9muF0WsnFrd+uFKzaA/VxLqmqYNhdEHYRnxOIPWIJ7pAKrWWPHC NO9zzjpcNZvbB1hPjwjqEGnorCAkl58SRx68k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rEb+Vp6IFV8EK47SbrwWr46c+vGMVAo1mJFhaQP3IA/zJxFGIwgMPTTpIlwIeTO14r x4W+na+ZxfSMHPFAPDOt5wlNd2qB9A2zGmk4E8Tl333t+7L/cU/QhnlSvt+Yf8p9IBla T6GGHtuDPBiKAYQ+5iFM7eEKyZUBm6D/KGLtY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.7 with SMTP id d7mr6909674wbt.54.1283275198902; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:19:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.127.72 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:19:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1283272543717-2798331.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <982615.91957.qm@web50802.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <1283272543717-2798331.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:49:58 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Performance difference between two builds. From: Deepak Goel To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f723d061398f048f21ca80 --001485f723d061398f048f21ca80 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hey Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag Sure. But they would more or less appear in both the results hence negating any side effects (there would be a little, and i wonder how you can let that go). Deepak -- Keigu Deepak +91-9765089593 deicool@gmail.com http://www.simtree.net Skype: thumsupdeicool Google talk: deicool Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool "Contribute to the world, environment and more : http://www.gridrepublic.org " On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:05 PM, kblearner wrote: > > Hi, > Careful while using method level profiling tools, since they themselves > consume resources and have memory & CPU footprint. The timings may not be > accurate. > > Cheers. > -- > View this message in context: > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/Performance-difference-between-two-builds-tp2637960p2798331.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --001485f723d061398f048f21ca80--