Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 16923 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 13:42:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 13:42:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 38208 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 13:42:01 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 37925 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 13:41:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "JMeter Users List" Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 37912 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 13:41:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:41:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.5 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bhatt.chaitanya@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.44] (HELO mail-vw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.212.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:41:51 +0000 Received: by vws14 with SMTP id 14so1138190vws.31 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:40:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WkDancyoNXuvLbvyTT9vCw19Sy/3kYQ3AkwbkwWssMU=; b=FJ84GPLL8NJCu69o8j9AhD8QW5vzkPqdgHT4zEHwf1K3GWxKEIomlL1N6sg19qLQS0 b02PpNCz0sMpSflf4bE042B2sQ3yV2onoPnEhLkhHBOqK1qMm/Aj1jOjAXRytlS9c7W2 fFIO5LPnO4zdpTt/VkY+Mq4Pk8jSERdEVi6ec= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=LCvyctHL8E/7tUfP6oL3uH1eJ70kl9I4cXktodwld2B2eXsHDPmVcdoTagyHClEAix eGCyzTQG18V0WXtJSK1uDUxK+vdP7eALG4U1KEjELTJ/Wvgor382acpXIVw2YBc22efg QsHQNDrsSa4kIIEprdJ07TK0pR1VBqWP7LMfI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.88.138 with SMTP id a10mr4358935vcm.96.1278596429260; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:40:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.71.205 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 06:40:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1278589409575-1044999.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1278589409575-1044999.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 19:10:29 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: negative response times again From: chaitanya bhatt To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016363b7b70fa2855048ae06da2 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016363b7b70fa2855048ae06da2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Are you by any possibility using Virtual Machines for load injection? -Chaitanya M Bhatt http://www.performancecompetence.com On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:13 PM, monpru wrote: > > Hi, > I got negative latency values in my last load test of a web service. I > searched the web and found that this might have something to do with the > jdk > I use? I wonder what the problem is or how to ensure that I get correct > latency in future tests? I am not allowed to use Wireshark or similar to > check transmission times. The load during the tests was quite low (350 > requests/minute) and none of the machines involved in the test struggled. I > used 2 thread groups with one Constant Throughput Timer each, all samplers > are SOAP/XML-RPC Requests. I use csv format for logging. > I tried to re-run the test using different jdks and got results that > differed, but had negative and 0 latency in each of the tests. > I used JMeter 2.3.4 r785646 > and tried with the following > -Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_16-b02, mixed mode) > -BEA JRockit(R) (build > R26.4.0-63_CR302700-72606-1.5.0_06-20061127-1104-linux-ia32 > -Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_06-b05, mixed mode) > on a machine with CentOS release 4.7 and got negative and 0 latency for > all. > > I tried on a different machine using BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_08 JVM > R24.5.0-61 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 2): here > I only had 0 load time (the last value) for some requests, but no negative > or 0 latency. But I am unsure if this means the latency is correct this > time? > > I might be overlooking something obvious here, so I would be thankful for > hints regarding this problem. > > Regards, > Monique > -- > View this message in context: > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/negative-response-times-again-tp1044999p1044999.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > --0016363b7b70fa2855048ae06da2--