Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11521 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2010 13:08:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Jul 2010 13:08:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 1958 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 13:08:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1560 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2010 13:08:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "JMeter Users List" Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 1551 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2010 13:08:41 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:08:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.3 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of deicool@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.172] (HELO mail-yx0-f172.google.com) (209.85.213.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 13:08:36 +0000 Received: by yxm8 with SMTP id 8so137194yxm.31 for ; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:07:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=w8/h5Y20MWs+EL0doQvcAuPfSKjowTMcRJB1MUZjitQ=; b=P8/UQBuFx2gvUPTZaKYLqNe5H4PMOVyXIn168ubweLZGewnPASgvgNsOxBGebnB2WF ozgkFv8opGJ6XpZySsxDGGoZvDdZIpNiyIpwz4+IPBcCPRcatC8KGrbaZfz4zdAn5EmS g+ptsuT0stG81QKmByGqdVtpFPb7Ji9vQy2vU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wwN2/TzLdL7j3Y3ggPNI1WLH4wbwHOiNpeVx7efXseGfnuvLvJdVNFsLvhYmTDmDWg Zx+91gGCjnmkDr6xHbS8UwI9ZgiYnl4HMKuTwX2SuCQbpgbS6guKg3x+D1KMj0HiYroQ lw0SLtHBMDM/F9uoSoyYvn0GHI4KiZZssQ9Pc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.51.4 with SMTP id y4mr8128382agy.102.1278594434968; Thu, 08 Jul 2010 06:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.87.8 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jul 2010 06:07:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1278589409575-1044999.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <1278589409575-1044999.post@n5.nabble.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2010 18:37:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: negative response times again From: Deepak Goel To: JMeter Users List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Some thoughts: 1. Can you please post the whole network and server diagram? 2. What is your precision level for measuring latency? 3. It could be possible you might be getting all errors. It would help if you could post the results also. Thanks Deepak On 7/8/10, monpru wrote: > > Hi, > I got negative latency values in my last load test of a web service. I > searched the web and found that this might have something to do with the jdk > I use? I wonder what the problem is or how to ensure that I get correct > latency in future tests? I am not allowed to use Wireshark or similar to > check transmission times. The load during the tests was quite low (350 > requests/minute) and none of the machines involved in the test struggled. I > used 2 thread groups with one Constant Throughput Timer each, all samplers > are SOAP/XML-RPC Requests. I use csv format for logging. > I tried to re-run the test using different jdks and got results that > differed, but had negative and 0 latency in each of the tests. > I used JMeter 2.3.4 r785646 > and tried with the following > -Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_16-b02, mixed mode) > -BEA JRockit(R) (build > R26.4.0-63_CR302700-72606-1.5.0_06-20061127-1104-linux-ia32 > -Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 1.5.0_06-b05, mixed mode) > on a machine with CentOS release 4.7 and got negative and 0 latency for all. > > I tried on a different machine using BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_08 JVM > R24.5.0-61 on Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 2): here > I only had 0 load time (the last value) for some requests, but no negative > or 0 latency. But I am unsure if this means the latency is correct this > time? > > I might be overlooking something obvious here, so I would be thankful for > hints regarding this problem. > > Regards, > Monique > -- > View this message in context: > http://jmeter.512774.n5.nabble.com/negative-response-times-again-tp1044999p1044999.html > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org > > -- Namaskara~Nalama~Guten Tag -- Keigu Deepak +91-9765089593 deicool@gmail.com Skype: thumsupdeicool Google talk: deicool Blog: http://loveandfearless.wordpress.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/deicool Check out my Work at: LinkedIn: http://in.linkedin.com/in/thumsupdeicool "Contribute to the world, environment and more : http://www.gridrepublic.org" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org