Thanks for the reply! We are updating the JVM on our linux machine, since
it was 1.4.2 and my machine was 1.5.0.
Carl
On 10/23/09 10:05 AM, "sebb" <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 20/10/2009, Carl Shaulis <cshaulis@homeaway.com> wrote:
>> Riddle me this batman!
>>
>> If I execute a test of 100 threads using my machine as the master and a
>> linux machine as the slave with each thread executing a single request I do
>> NOT get any negative response times.
>>
>> If I schedule a test of 100 threads to run 5 minutes looping indefinitely
>> the single request, I am getting negative response times.
>>
>> This does not make sense to me.
>>
>> More thoughts?
>>
>
> The elapsed times are calculated by the sampler, so clock skew won't
> affect them. The times
>
> Which version of JMeter are you using?
> JVM?
>
> The elapsed time calculation depends on both of these.
>
> Do the timestamps look reasonable?
>
>> Carl
>>
>>
>>
>> On 10/20/09 1:14 PM, "Peter Lin" <woolfel@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> both systems must be insync.
>>>
>>> That's fundamental to all distributed applications, including
>>> distributed testing.
>>>
>>> peter
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Carl Shaulis <cshaulis@homeaway.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The difference appears to be about 10 seconds between the clock on my
>>>> machine and the slave server. I added a constant timer and that made no
>>>> difference.
>>>>
>>>> Do the two machines really have to be set down to the exact second?
>>>>
>>>> I would think we are measuring the delta between start and stop on the same
>>>> machine, so the clocks should not matter.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Carl
>>>>
>>>> On 10/20/09 1:06 PM, "Deepak Shetty" <shettyd@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> are the time clocks on both machines in sync?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Carl Shaulis
>>>>> <cshaulis@homeaway.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We have recently set up a distributed JMeter environment. I am using
my
>>>>>> MacBook Pro as the Master and a Linux machine as the slave. I executed
a
>>>>>> very simple test for 5 minutes, where 500 concurrent users access
a
>>>>>> static
>>>>>> html page. The results showed an average response time of 0 ms.
Looking
>>>>>> more closely at the data there are numerous transactions that look
like
>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thread Name: SorryPageTest 1-97
>>>>>> Sample Start: 2009-10-20 12:42:29 CDT
>>>>>> Load time: -897
>>>>>> Latency: -897
>>>>>> Size in bytes: 1723
>>>>>> Sample Count: 1
>>>>>> Error Count: 0
>>>>>> Response code: 200
>>>>>> Response message: OK
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can you get a negative load time and negative latency with a
200
>>>>>> response code?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Help!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Carl
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
|