From jmeter-user-return-17507-apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive=jakarta.apache.org@jakarta.apache.org Thu Aug 23 20:13:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 90419 invoked from network); 23 Aug 2007 20:13:16 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 23 Aug 2007 20:13:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 20694 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2007 20:13:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20673 invoked by uid 500); 23 Aug 2007 20:13:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "JMeter Users List" Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 20662 invoked by uid 99); 23 Aug 2007 20:13:10 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:13:10 -0700 Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of adseth@cisco.com designates 171.71.176.70 as permitted sender) Received: from [171.71.176.70] (HELO sj-iport-1.cisco.com) (171.71.176.70) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:13:13 +0000 Received: from sj-dkim-1.cisco.com ([171.71.179.21]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2007 13:12:52 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: i="4.19,301,1183359600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="14790965:sNHT35733750" Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (sj-core-2.cisco.com [171.71.177.254]) by sj-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id l7NKCqY5030230 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:12:52 -0700 Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id l7NKCqxl002275 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:12:52 GMT Received: from xmb-sjc-227.amer.cisco.com ([128.107.191.43]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:12:52 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7E5C1.FBE0E9DC" Subject: Timers Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:12:53 -0700 Message-ID: <9A6C78C06ACD4241A1F82FF8F6D12EAE0226EC0B@xmb-sjc-227.amer.cisco.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Timers Thread-Index: AcflwfyLlC8LAVKoRYC3zTMTCrvlkA== From: "Aditi Seth \(adseth\)" To: "JMeter Users List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Aug 2007 20:12:52.0238 (UTC) FILETIME=[FBFBCAE0:01C7E5C1] DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=5007; t=1187899972; x=1188763972; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim1004; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=adseth@cisco.com; z=From:=20=22Aditi=20Seth=20\(adseth\)=22=20 |Subject:=20Timers=20 |Sender:=20; bh=vISF0Nmd6b++JgFAf2H848asq1IGO/JU3o9y6fvO3tQ=; b=mbcK9B1Re71h2HjRZJfv/5v4rEZ+gfTRTuiXH5eimBrW71drj5U1cnpA7+BAA8Q27E+kbdAB U8I5mw+FPE2mZQPxFokwdb6dnqlHq8ZyBElN9Q9YSiVN34KRkVT26b4KASAhQTh60+pMO8BEms kQDYODKV0t9tuTDnOI3pWcJ4I=; Authentication-Results: sj-dkim-1; header.From=adseth@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim1004 verified; ); X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7E5C1.FBE0E9DC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi , =20 I am trying to setup a test plan where each request has a delay associated with it and each of these delays are different. =20 Example =20 Thread group -simple controller gaussian random timer - login=20 - http request A ( delay 1 min) - http request B=20 - gaussian random timer ( delay 5 mins) - http request C =20 - gaussian random timer (delay 10 mins) =20 =20 Bascially, each user access page A every min, page B once in 5 mins and page C once in 10 mins. And the login request needs to be shared between these requests. =20 I did try to add timers to each request , but the flow is sequential. Request A is now delayed by sum of all these timers.=20 Do I need different thread groups for this scenario? Or is there any other nice trick that I am missing. =20 Thanks, Aditi ------_=_NextPart_001_01C7E5C1.FBE0E9DC--