jmeter-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jian Tong" <to...@Toronto.CBC.CA>
Subject Re: Throughput in Aggregate report
Date Sun, 17 Dec 2006 22:32:58 GMT
Hi Peter,

These articles are great. Thanks alot. By the way, do you also have
articles related to "user based" testing ? 

I would appreciate it if anybody can refer me docs covering this topic.

Thank you

Jian

------------------------------------------
Jian Tong - QA 
Production and Operations, CBC.ca
Extension:  3357
Location:    2C400-N
-------------------------------------------
>>> "Peter Lin" <woolfel@gmail.com> 12/14/06 6:45 PM >>>
http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/articles/performance.pdf
http://cvs.apache.org/~woolfel/article.zip


On 12/14/06, Ron Miller <ron.miller@cobancorporation.com> wrote:
>
> Peter, I searched for your article but couldn't find it. Would you
> please send a link to it?
>
> Ron
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Lin [mailto:woolfel@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 3:24 PM
> To: JMeter Users List
> Subject: Re: Throughput in Aggregate report
>
> usually I look at the capacity of the network and determine if the
> bytes/sec
> is going to saturate the bandwidth or not.  I have an article in the
> wiki
> that explains this stuff in detail.
>
> peter
>
> On 12/14/06, Jian Tong <TongJ@toronto.cbc.ca> wrote:
> >
> >  Hi Peter,
> >
> > As you said bytes/sec and requests/sec are better metrics for load
> > testing, then I hope to know what the benchmark is for bytes/sec and
> > requests/sec from your experience ?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jian Tong
> >
> > >>> "Peter Lin" <woolfel@gmail.com> 12/13/06 8:29 PM >>>
> > jmeter will measure the requests per second. that isn't the same as
> pages
> > per second for a couple of reasons.
> >
> > 1. a page may have multiple images and stuff embedded
> > 2. images are cached by the browser the first time it's loaded
> > 3. not every page is the same, so page per second a poor measurement
> of
> > load
> > 4. bytes per second or requests per second is a better measurement
> > 5. what happens when the pages change and a page ends up having more
> > images?
> >
> > loadRunner is a good product. Pages downloaded per second isn't all
> that
> > useful from a capacity and planning perspective. It is much better
to
> > measure bytes/second and requests/second.
> >
> > my bias opinion.
> >
> > peter
> >
> > On 12/13/06, rmiller <ron.miller@cobancorporation.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > We use Pages Downloaded per Second as a performance metric in
> > LoadRunner.
> > > In
> > > side by side tests with LoadRunner and JMeter there dosen't seem
to
> be
> > any
> > > correlation between that metric in LoadRunner and Throughput in
> JMeter.
> > > Can
> > > someone please explain how to get the eaquivalent metric in
JMeter?
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Ron
> > > --
> > > View this message in context:
> > >
> >
>
http://www.nabble.com/Throughput-in-Aggregate-report-tf2817925.html#a786
> 5207
> > > Sent from the JMeter - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org


Mime
View raw message