Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" <jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of woolfel@gmail.com designates
 64.233.170.201 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=dFNeuLZF+kUGrqAWvjVl3VttTgDH7ZV9sPJMamDR2ZRaL1U9CjrcBxRGpftEgj10YuqythTTJ7yiBTTsR2eTEnaaDQhh+cy4O3JyCy9BEqqQpVKSOFUsI3eyMc3E10kF62ZN5Pdsbxf8UQtM7omrbskAFewpV0VgkL0g9GMJjJk=
Message-ID: <27e674a905050404462abd2d08@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2005 07:46:27 -0400
From: Peter Lin <woolfel@gmail.com>
Reply-To: Peter Lin <woolfel@gmail.com>
To: JMeter Users List <jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Concurrent users
In-Reply-To: <BAY18-F23F4EB2CAF5EE226A7786ADE190@phx.gbl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <BAY18-F23F4EB2CAF5EE226A7786ADE190@phx.gbl>

20 concurrent isn't much load for jmeter to handle. think of it this way.

the load increased by 20x, but the time increase is less than that. 20
concurrent users finishing in 80 seconds isn't bad. Or is the 80
seconds per user?  Since the jdbc results showed similar results,
chances are the queries could use some tuning.

peter


On 5/4/05, Thinh Nguyen <thainguy99@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> I've started to use JMeter for the last 2 weeks or so. I am trying to do
> some performance testing with 1 user multiple times (eg 20) and 20
> concurrent users at 1 time.
>=20
> The results that I received for the two scenarios are too much different.=
 An
> average of a user 20 times is around 5 seconds, whereas, average for 20
> concurrent users at 1 time is around 80 seconds.
>=20
> I understand that concurrent users will be slower, but I don't expect it =
to
> be that much slower. I am not sure if this problem is part of the tool or
> it's with the code.
>=20
> I even tried to run the JDBC testing, and the average result are still a =
lot
> different from 1 user * 20 times compared to 20 users at 1 time.
>=20
> Could anyone please kindly explain to me or direct me to somewhere that I
> can read/reduce the performance for concurrent users? I am facing the hur=
dle
> at the moment, please kindly help.
>=20
> Thanks & Regards,
> Thinh
>=20
> _________________________________________________________________
> REALESTATE: biggest buy/rent/share listings
> http://ninemsn.realestate.com.au
>=20
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>=20
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org