Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 79140 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2005 03:43:28 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (209.237.227.199) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 30 Mar 2005 03:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 63499 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2005 03:43:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 63474 invoked by uid 500); 30 Mar 2005 03:43:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "JMeter Users List" Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 63460 invoked by uid 99); 30 Mar 2005 03:43:26 -0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.4 required=10.0 tests=DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE,RCVD_BY_IP,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (hermes.apache.org: domain of woolfel@gmail.com designates 64.233.170.205 as permitted sender) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (HELO rproxy.gmail.com) (64.233.170.205) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:43:26 -0800 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so8694rng for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:43:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=n9w3KUbYTG+d1ge3RB+350/qusriMEAqxjpvKr6Klcprfr/4QdHEKOMQkjZgWzIAnO+STiCh0bpx4glc4lcBmx3iu/xlHzFtVXYkPWkr/FyfRfyRGGEbspyJGnVTxY/i+G/ZxEF0pwQ3n4kK2ej+L2qWr3TJAs16ljNv22ramyE= Received: by 10.38.69.34 with SMTP id r34mr88455rna; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:43:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.86.21 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:43:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <27e674a90503291943665f2372@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:43:24 -0500 From: Peter Lin Reply-To: Peter Lin To: JMeter Users List Subject: Re: 1000 concurrent users In-Reply-To: <20050330023036.67724.qmail@web41528.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050330023036.67724.qmail@web41528.mail.yahoo.com> X-Virus-Checked: Checked X-Spam-Rating: minotaur.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I would 100-200 threads per client machine, which means 5-10 client machines. 1K concurrent load is pretty heafty, so I'm assuming the server has multiple ethernet ports or using gigabit. a single 100mbit ethernet port will not be able to handle that kind of load. peter On Tue, 29 Mar 2005 18:30:36 -0800 (PST), Ghananeel Gondhali wrote: > Hi, > > I need to generate a 1000 concurrent user load on an application. > > Remote testing currently seems to be the option, but could anyone throw light on how many load generating machines would be required and what would the best configuration for the controller / load generators be. > > thanks in advance > > regards, > Raj Gondhali > > > --------------------------------- > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Mail - now with 250MB free storage. Learn more. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: jmeter-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org