Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-jakarta-jmeter-user-archive@apache.org Received: (qmail 37341 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2002 16:09:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nagoya.betaversion.org) (192.18.49.131) by daedalus.apache.org with SMTP; 6 Sep 2002 16:09:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 19287 invoked by uid 97); 6 Sep 2002 16:10:20 -0000 Delivered-To: qmlist-jakarta-archive-jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19271 invoked by uid 97); 6 Sep 2002 16:10:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact jmeter-user-help@jakarta.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Help: List-Post: List-Id: "JMeter Users List" Reply-To: "JMeter Users List" Delivered-To: mailing list jmeter-user@jakarta.apache.org Received: (qmail 19259 invoked by uid 98); 6 Sep 2002 16:10:19 -0000 X-Antivirus: nagoya (v4218 created Aug 14 2002) From: "Mike Stover" To: JMeter Users List Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2002 12:08:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: Re; Functional Mode Checkbox and Quick and Dirty Functional T esting Reply-to: mstover1@apache.org Message-ID: <3D789AAF.32411.3B6177C@localhost> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <3D6CFAEE245FD411938A00508BE37148083481AA@exchnj01.nj.ssmb.com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.01) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N X-Spam-Rating: daedalus.apache.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N I did. I don't see it. The assertions apply prior to the text is encoded for xml. -Mike On 6 Sep 2002 at 11:30, Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] wrote: > You're right > View Results Tree is superior. > You may want to remove View Results from the GUI to avoid confusion > especially as it doesn't work anymore. > > By the way, do Assertions go against the html in the form it is stored in > the jtl (i.e. with all characters converted to character entities such as > > for >) or with html as in the View Results? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Stover > To: JMeter Users List > Sent: 9/6/02 11:09 AM > Subject: RE: Re; Functional Mode Checkbox and Quick and Dirty Functional T > esting > > View Results is defunct and removed. View Results Tree was superior in > every way, so I got > rid of View Results. Use the Tree for equivalent purposes. > > -Mike > > On 6 Sep 2002 at 10:18, Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] wrote: > > > Hi Mike > > > > I just re-tried these on the nitely build from yesterday and it did > work for > > the html captured in the jtl file and the "View Results Tree"!! > > > > Wonderful!! > > > > Only 1 new problem? > > Did something change on the "View Results" screen. > > When I go here there is a test box for the Name (in this defaults to > View > > Results) but there is no text box to view the html and no Next button. > This > > could be as a result of running using JDK 1.4 on Windows XP (I usually > run > > on SUN Solaris 2.6 OS with JDK 1.3.1 which I'll try again on Monday) > > > > Anyway I wasn't able to check what was captured in the View Results > screen. > > > > Thanks Mike > > > > Andy > > > > P.S. I believe I was using the unstable version before. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mike Stover > > To: JMeter Users List > > Sent: 9/5/02 3:34 PM > > Subject: RE: Re; Functional Mode Checkbox and Quick and Dirty > Functional T > > esting > > > > What version is that? I'd prefer you did these experiments on the > > latest nightly. > > > > -Mike > > > > On 5 Sep 2002 at 15:21, Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] wrote: > > > > > > > > Tried this with a couple of more report pages of the same type that > > had the > > > problem where captured html was incomplete. > > > I looked at the html captured in several places: > > > 1) log file- this is always truncated at the same place > > > I did find a non-ascii character in one of the files at the > > point of > > > truncation but not all files have this. > > > > > > 2) View Results- sometimes captured the whole file, sometimes > > truncated > > > in that same place > > > 3) View Results Tree- also shows truncated html in same place. > > > > > > This for the same page in the same run of the test!! > > > > > > > > > In terms of looking in the log, is there something I need to do to > > turn on > > > the log; the version I'm using doesn't seem to write to a log file. > > > > > > Thanks again > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Mike Stover [mailto:mstover1@apache.org] > > > Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 9:18 AM > > > To: JMeter Users List > > > Subject: Re: Re; Functional Mode Checkbox and Quick and Dirty > > Functional > > > Testi ng > > > > > > > > > My only thought on this is that Avalon's ConfigurationSerializer is > > choking > > > on some > > > special character in your page and throwing an exception, and JMeter > > is > > > catching > > > it silently. Have you checked JMeter's logs? It's recently > improved, > > so > > > it'd be nice > > > to use the logging system to track this down. Look in > > > org.apache.jmeter.save.SaveService.java for places to put > interesting > > log > > > statements. > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > On 5 Sep 2002 at 8:53, Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I thought I had sent this mail previously but it seems as though > it > > didn't > > > > go? > > > > Sorry for the delay. > > > > > > > > I have not yet figured out why the html page is not always > > completely > > > > captured. > > > > However when I use the "View Results" visualizer, the full page if > > there? > > > > > > > > It seems to stop consistently in the same place in this page. > > > > > > > > Also I put the page through an html checker and it passed (plus it > > > displays > > > > properly in both IE 5.x,6 and NS 4.x and 6.x. > > > > > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:25 AM > > > > To: 'mstover1@apache.org'; Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] > > > > Subject: RE: Functional Mode Checkbox and quick and dirty > Functional > > > > testi ng > > > > > > > > > > > > Sounds good. > > > > One more thing I've discovered in my testing; the html for one of > my > > pages > > > > is not being fully loaded into the log file; is there any > limitation > > to > > > the > > > > storing of html that you know of? > > > > > > > > (Another curious thing is that the html saved changes all the html > > angle > > > > brackets to < and > Not a problem just curious) > > > > > > > > The page in question does display properly in both Netscape and > IE. > > > > > > > > This would limit the usefulness of this new feature; there was no > > error > > > > detected but I did not have an assertion for > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Mike Stover [mailto:mstover1@apache.org] > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:26 AM > > > > To: Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] > > > > Subject: RE: Functional Mode Checkbox and quick and dirty > Functional > > > > testi ng > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's kinda what I imagined: > > > > > > > > The visualizer looks like the View Results Tree (ie, there's a > tree > > that > > > > holds results or some > > > > sort, you click on a node, you see the details below). > > > > > > > > It also has 2 additional fields where the user can specify the > name > > of two > > > > requests in the test. > > > > The visualizer will then create diffs against these two requests, > > and from > > > > the diff info, create > > > > the nodes in the tree. Thus, each node in the tree isn't a normal > > result > > > > but rather, the diff > > > > between the two specified results. > > > > > > > > I don't know exactly what your needs are, so you make it whatever > > you > > > want, > > > > of course. The > > > > visualizer could be dependent on a "diff" command being on the > > system, and > > > > windows users > > > > can always install cygwin (it's the first thing I do on any > windows > > box). > > > > It might also be worth a > > > > few minutes to search the web for a diff Java implementation. > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > On 27 Aug 2002 at 7:17, Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Mike > > > > > > > > > > This seems to be working for me pretty well; so far I am using > > perl to > > > > parse > > > > > out the html files, massage them and compare them but that could > > be done > > > > > easily with Java regular expressions as well. > > > > > > > > > > You mention creating a visualizer; I'd like to perhaps build > this > > if you > > > > > feel it fits into jMeter plans; what do you think it should look > > like? > > > Any > > > > > pointers? > > > > > I think there should be an additional input field to specify the > > run > > > that > > > > is > > > > > to be compared. > > > > > The actual result would consist of the output of the diff > command > > on the > > > > > html files within the 2 logs. However I'm not sure if there is a > > > > > cross-platform version of diff. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Mike Stover [mailto:mstover1@apache.org] > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 5:09 PM > > > > > To: JMeter Users List > > > > > Subject: Re: Functional Mode Checkbox and quick and dirty > > Functional > > > > > testing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > First, you have noticed the one and only difference that > choosing > > > > > "functional testing" makes. > > > > > > > > > > Second, that sounds like an interesting idea - to make a > > visualizer that > > > > > compares the > > > > > functional differences between two test runs? I think your > > proposed use > > > > of > > > > > such a tool is an > > > > > excellent idea. > > > > > > > > > > -Mike > > > > > > > > > > On 20 Aug 2002 at 15:21, Sosnowski, Andrew P [IT] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you give me an idea of what is the intent behind the > > Functional > > > Mode > > > > > > testing checkbox on the front page? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This was my plan for a quick and dirty functional test: > > > > > > We have a Staging environment and a production environment for > > our > > > app. > > > > > > When we make a new release of our app I would like to capture > > and > > > > compare > > > > > > the html responses of running a test script with the new > version > > of > > > the > > > > > app > > > > > > on the Staging Environment and the old version still in > > Production. > > > > > > Then I would compare the 2 versions of html and make sure that > > nothing > > > > > > changed that was not expected to change. > > > > > > Of course I have to ignore Referrer Headers values and > > time-stamps and > > > > > > various cookies that are different on the different servers. > > > > > > > > > > > > When I tried using this mode I did find the html within > > > tags > > > in > > > > > the > > > > > > log file. > > > > > > It looks like it might work as a quick and dirty way to > compare. > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps it might be worth building in some additional support > > for this > > > > > kind > > > > > > of testing into jMeter? For example store html cleaned of > > timestamps > > > in > > > > a > > > > > > file separate from the log file (or jtl file) > > > > > > I might be willing to do this if others would find it useful. > > Also any > > > > > ideas > > > > > > of how to make it more useful and general are appreciated > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Michael Stover > > > > > mstover1@apache.org > > > > > Yahoo IM: mstover_ya > > > > > ICQ: 152975688 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Michael Stover > > > > mstover1@apache.org > > > > Yahoo IM: mstover_ya > > > > ICQ: 152975688 > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Michael Stover > > > mstover1@apache.org > > > Yahoo IM: mstover_ya > > > ICQ: 152975688 > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Michael Stover > > mstover1@apache.org > > Yahoo IM: mstover_ya > > ICQ: 152975688 > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > > -- > Michael Stover > mstover1@apache.org > Yahoo IM: mstover_ya > ICQ: 152975688 > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > For additional commands, e-mail: > -- Michael Stover mstover1@apache.org Yahoo IM: mstover_ya ICQ: 152975688 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail: