Mailing-List: contact issues-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: issues@jmeter.apache.org
From: bugzilla@apache.org
To: issues@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: [Bug 61375] http proxy server request fails when DNS manager custom
 resolver enabled
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:13:25 +0000
Message-ID: <bug-61375-58895-VB5mGmlH95@https.bz.apache.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-61375-58895@https.bz.apache.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-61375-58895@https.bz.apache.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
archived-at: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 12:13:34 -0000

https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D61375

--- Comment #6 from Felix Schumacher <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> ---
(In reply to JJ Welch from comment #5)
> I use the software package called "Charles Proxy", www.charlesproxy.com .=
 I
> could try this with Fiddler on a windows machine as well.
>=20
> I was thinking that there could be a logical test in the code that skips =
DNS
> when the proxy is an IP address instead of a name. Not sure how hard that
> would be to write a method for "isAnIP" - the regex pattern for that might
> introduce some other unexpected behavior or edge cases.
>=20
> I do have an entry in /etc/hosts for localhost as 127.0.0.1 so I am
> surprised that there was an issue when I tried localhost as the proxy ser=
ver
> name.
>=20
> What was different in jmeter 2.x that allowed the proxy and the dns manag=
er
> to work so well together?

The change was introduced with bug 57447, where it was explicitly requested=
 to
ignore the systems normal dns configuration.

I think we could re-enable the usage for the static host entries as a last
resort.

On a different subject. Why did you put so many dns servers in your resolver
list?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=