jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Felix Schumacher <felix.schumac...@internetallee.de>
Subject Re: Release 5.4.1
Date Sat, 09 Jan 2021 21:04:12 GMT

Am 09.01.21 um 17:45 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> Hello Felix,
> My answers inline below.
>
> Regards
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 4:28 PM Felix Schumacher
> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
> <mailto:felix.schumacher@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>
>
>     Am 09.01.21 um 15:28 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>     Hello,
>>     First best wishes for 2021 for all the team, I hope you're all
>>     doing fine !
>>
>>     Second, I think we should release a 5.4.1 now.
>>     On my side I've been testing it for few days on Mac OSX and I
>>     also made some tests on Windows, my colleague did it on Linux.
>>
>>     The last bug on JTree due to Darklaf
>>     (https://github.com/weisJ/darklaf/issues/228) was already there
>>     in 5.3 and it's not that problematic.
>>
>>     WDYT ?
>
>     I would like to hear your opinion on the bugs 65053 and 65034.
>
>     Bug 65053 is about downgrading JSONPath to 2.4.0 due to a bug with
>     regex parsing. I think we could go back to 2.4.0 without loosing
>     too much.
>
> Ok by me, sounds acceptable.
>
>     Bug 65034 is about an old bug(?) in handling reading of
>     binarytcpclient when no EOM is set. Those requests will always
>     fail (at least in my tests). I think we should change the
>     behaviour for the case when no EOM is given to not fail on
>     SocketTimeoutException.
>
>
> I looked at your patch, it looks good to me. Thanks

Both committed.

Felix

>     Apart from that, I am in favour of releasing soon (or even now :) )
>
>     Felix
>
>>     Regards
>>     Philippe
>>
>>     On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:27 PM Felix Schumacher
>>     <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>     <mailto:felix.schumacher@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>         Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad
>>         <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <mailto:philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>>:
>>         >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>         >felix.schumacher@internetallee.de
>>         <mailto:felix.schumacher@internetallee.de>> wrote:
>>         >
>>         >>
>>         >>
>>         >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>         >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>         <mailto:philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>>:
>>         >> >Hello,
>>         >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>         >>
>>         >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>         >>
>>         >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans
>>         while working
>>         >on the
>>         >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on
>>         Ubuntu with
>>         >Darklaf
>>         >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>         >>
>>         >
>>         >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>         >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>         >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it
>>         yet.
>>
>>         I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>
>>         >
>>         >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>
>>         I don't have that os :)
>>
>>         >
>>         >>
>>         >> >
>>         >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>         >>
>>         >> How long should we calculate?
>>         >>
>>         >
>>         >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows,
>>         what do
>>         >you
>>         >think ?
>>
>>         I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if
>>         you want to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has
>>         been performed by the reporters of the last issues (all
>>         windows based I believe), then we should wait a bit more and
>>         test actively on windows.
>>
>>         Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the
>>         level of testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux
>>         seems to work great ;) in the mean time I will try to test on
>>         windows, too.
>>
>>         Regards
>>          Felix
>>
>>         >
>>         >>
>>         >> Regards
>>         >>  Felix
>>         >>
>>         >>
>>         >> >
>>         >> >Thanks
>>         >> >
>>         >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber
>>         <milamber@apache.org <mailto:milamber@apache.org>>
>>         >wrote:
>>         >> >
>>         >> >>
>>         >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>         >> >>
>>         >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>         >> >> > Hi all,
>>         >> >> >
>>         >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people
>>         time for
>>         >> >feedback on
>>         >> >> > the last release.
>>         >> >> >
>>         >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as
RM?
>>         >> >> >
>>         >> >> > Regards
>>         >> >> >
>>         >> >> >   Felix
>>         >> >> >
>>         >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>         >> >> >
>>         >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>         >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>         >> >> >>> Hello,
>>         >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1
due to
>>         some
>>         >> >regressions
>>         >> >> and
>>         >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>         >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release.
I
>>         would like
>>         >to
>>         >> >wait a
>>         >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported
(not
>>         weeks,
>>         >> >though).
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly
since
>>         it was
>>         >> >introduced
>>         >> >> issues
>>         >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is
very
>>         reactive to fix
>>         >> >those
>>         >> >> issues
>>         >> >> >>> which is great.
>>         >> >> >>>
>>         >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms
of UI
>>         experience
>>         >(at
>>         >> >least
>>         >> >> the
>>         >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still
not stable.
>>         >> >> >>>
>>         >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust
?
>>         >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect
them.
>>         And the
>>         >> >manual
>>         >> >> tests me
>>         >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>         >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX,
only
>>         sometimes on
>>         >> >Windows 10.
>>         >> >> >>>
>>         >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to
use it
>>         for one
>>         >> >customer,
>>         >> >> this is
>>         >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>         >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more
>>         automated
>>         >tests
>>         >> >for the
>>         >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving
test
>>         plans on a
>>         >> >Windows
>>         >> >> OS.
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing)
GUI?
>>         What would
>>         >be
>>         >> >a good
>>         >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic
stuff
>>         like
>>         >opening
>>         >> >a test
>>         >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>         >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe
we should
>>         switch
>>         >back
>>         >> >to
>>         >> >> System
>>         >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>         >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >> Regards
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >>   Felix
>>         >> >> >>
>>         >> >> >>> Regards
>>         >> >>
>>         >> >>
>>         >>
>>
>>
>>
>>     -- 
>>     Cordialement.
>>     Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message