From dev-return-11044-archive-asf-public=cust-asf.ponee.io@jmeter.apache.org Mon Jan 15 13:48:41 2018 Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@eu.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by mx-eu-01.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488C5180657 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:48:41 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 383A1160C31; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:48:41 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 7EB56160C25 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:48:40 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 78102 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jan 2018 12:48:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 78091 invoked by uid 99); 15 Jan 2018 12:48:39 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:48:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id E9066C57D6 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:48:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.98 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.98 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DReNF6JX1zSW for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 9.mo178.mail-out.ovh.net (9.mo178.mail-out.ovh.net [46.105.75.45]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 19F545F2FD for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from player715.ha.ovh.net (b9.ovh.net [213.186.33.59]) by mo178.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38877027E for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:48:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-qt0-f169.google.com (mail-qt0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) (Authenticated sender: p.mouawad@ubik-ingenierie.com) by player715.ha.ovh.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 474291C00BB for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:48:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id a16so13976020qtj.3 for ; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:48:29 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytfTsoflGuGVozFugz3y/t5O+kBn4zHF+VMOuRqf2l1tnRHauYJT GiDtDXhlYKsWF5bMhQ4OiTGC3nCSeGNn5FpZVfQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouwgZD750jVVNUo3PMDBynRT2RiZxIXWNoVdTIfkidMdgEmwb2mxG2PyqmCYNP//PKw/95IVdRtNMR8xph/FyU= X-Received: by 10.200.15.141 with SMTP id b13mr10046484qtk.301.1516020508496; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:48:28 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.195.9 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Jan 2018 04:48:28 -0800 (PST) From: Philippe Mouawad Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 13:48:28 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Have a Functional Report To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c04f398e19a4a0562d00737" X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 11753550605822218444 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: 0 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtuddrleekgdegfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfqggfjpdevjffgvefmvefgnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecu --94eb2c04f398e19a4a0562d00737 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hello, Reading this SO question: - https://stackoverflow.com/questions/48253081/jmeter-reports-for-functional-testing I wonder if it's a field we should improve in JMeter ? We do not use it as functional testing tool, but if it is to be used this way, IMO, the report should be generated OOTB without ANT. Regards Philippe --94eb2c04f398e19a4a0562d00737--