jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <p.moua...@ubik-ingenierie.com>
Subject Re: Workbench : Let's drop it ?
Date Wed, 08 Nov 2017 16:18:53 GMT
Hello,
I’d say Test Plan.
I suggest testcompiler ignores them

Regards

On Wednesday, November 8, 2017, Artem Fedorov <artem.fedorov@blazemeter.com>
wrote:

> Hello,
>
> If we dropped WorkBench, in which element we can add Non-Test Elements
> (HTTP Mirror Server, HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder, Property Display)?
> Can we add these Non-Test Elements to Test Plan (root) or Test Fragment?
>
> Thanks
>
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> Без
> вирусов. www.avast.ru
> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_
> source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > wrote:
>
> > Great !
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <apc4@ya.ru
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > > FYI BlazeMeter will attempt to implement this change and contribute it.
> > >
> > > Andrey Pokhilko
> > >
> > > 04.11.2017 17:06, Andrey Pokhilko пишет:
> > > > I'll need to think about it.
> > > >
> > > > Andrey Pokhilko
> > > >
> > > > 04.11.2017 17:01, Philippe Mouawad пишет:
> > > >> On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <apc4@ya.ru
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1 from me, I think it is possible to automatically move elements
> > from
> > > >>> loaded test plans.
> > > >>>
> > > >> Do you have some time to contribute a patch for this if you think
> it's
> > > >> needed ?
> > > >>
> > > >>> Andrey Pokhilko
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 04.11.2017 15:18, Maxime Chassagneux пишет:
> > > >>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I never use it, except for recording script, so +1 for me.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> 2017-11-04 13:07 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > > philippe.mouawad@gmail.com <javascript:;>
> > > >>>> :
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>> Workbench element is confusing for beginners who don't
understand
> > > >>>>> clearly its use.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thinking more about it, I don't see today why we should
still
> keep
> > > it.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The only advantage of this element is Non Test Elements
which
> would
> > > >>>>> be made available from Test Plan directly.
> > > >>>>> When running a test those element would not impact test
plan.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The only issue is backward compatibility, should we try
to move
> > > >>> elements in
> > > >>>>> workbench under test plan or just mention a backward
> > incompatibility.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Users would manually move there elements to Test Plan.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Regards
> > > >>>>>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
Ubik-Ingénierie

UBIK LOAD PACK Web Site <http://www.ubikloadpack.com/>

UBIK LOAD PACK on TWITTER <https://twitter.com/ubikloadpack>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message