Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8687200C43 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:47:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id D6E9F160B87; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 269DE160B6B for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 16:47:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 23391 invoked by uid 500); 26 Mar 2017 14:47:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 23379 invoked by uid 99); 26 Mar 2017 14:47:55 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:47:55 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 7C0171AFCEC for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:47:55 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.796, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PVBDlE_20QiS for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:47:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wr0-f171.google.com (mail-wr0-f171.google.com [209.85.128.171]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 9D0145F610 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:47:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f171.google.com with SMTP id l43so22465885wre.1 for ; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 07:47:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hxa5zy2pfQDN8LaiZIudegTEzdM1T7VgwQotLyMJn5w=; b=jEi+uAwX8fPjPTrHShk2AhzXYKsq5ZwnkhWgn1YgPVH+stCE/QDXks4+W3R3OCvWeC Mx9VaII0SFaQDuR12uQdt9uB5wRbGgiJRvzwiNqQqU8tmmWOd5bk1r8CYCr+IyIwgu2V dVtsYALXWwugzctWG5YBINunkmpBmgxgTk6Wi6vL88RnT2Nz8l4I74rkp5hZ9G5PCmqU O6yLMIyrxGqA3NbYDxWrdZzmo6y0qxbLNXbeX+d1FoPj4LgUXXrrDiH31NRV8iiPe8P7 3tJz1pdU3d+B0IRse2Ma6d8ztxrLuDe0mXiwjjtmyNTdNXlKXMYGbylZplA9PKa+CgCb pPmw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hxa5zy2pfQDN8LaiZIudegTEzdM1T7VgwQotLyMJn5w=; b=VjMDlSHwsqm7VOLvXv1MsUHc0ORDZ8ngy8L6byjGDUPPzuottH1XvMsr+YXQipupuV lB0cPGA6oI9TPifEKDhxR67n5Sxl0jhx7bSZLvpsiuIx02am37f8XitE/X8c4folizv1 xFVLbozjJXJ9OZRh6RBjUW5PYEE4R2YZ+vR3IvDWNpB0TlgXQzywgsuJgpm+A5YXV/Cc sC8CjgWAgQHK453na6zwr3AqEH2c3N2WqDJDMMns7zrK1ICusnabp6lRxfRtrSzXJKhx 21XoT6p+zLUNPnaLzXqlfHKKQDGbDRuQfAQWK8m4Zjml38HdlXSNQUU2Gmnw7ASdoU1o OKfQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3+LoJ819Lc3voGpO0h/+/zXRF6xQ7+cHwWbbrxco/7XE09kM0C5KPamJHTc2kgPLNAhM8Oe0n6oJ+9ew== X-Received: by 10.223.175.207 with SMTP id y15mr1338574wrd.63.1490539673144; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 07:47:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.169.7 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Mar 2017 07:47:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: sebb Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 15:47:52 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Bugzilla and nightly build To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable archived-at: Sun, 26 Mar 2017 14:47:58 -0000 I see. The existing "Version" field is intended to record the version to which the report applies. There is also an advanced field (click on "Show Advanced Fields") called "Target Milestone" whose hover text is: "The Target Milestone field is used to define when the engineer the bug is assigned to expects to fix it." This field does not currently have any values, and I'm not sure it's what is wanted. AIUI what is being suggested is a field with the version which includes the= fix. Let's call it "Fix version". When a release has been made, that would be the actual release version. Prior to that it would be the upcoming release version. I'm not sure it's necessary to distinguish pending releases from actual releases in Bugzilla. It will be more work to maintain Bugzilla if snapshot releases are included= . Instead, the website links can just explain the process, i.e. the Fix Version is the version of the release in which the fix is included, and this may be a future release. This is how many of the Commons components treat the JIRA "Fix version" fie= ld. On 25 March 2017 at 19:20, Philippe Mouawad wr= ote: > Hi, > @Felix, you read correctly but the nighlty might be confusing if we forge= t > to move the fix version once we release > Something like 3.2-SNAPSHOT might be clearer no? > > Regards > > On Saturday, March 25, 2017, Felix Schumacher < > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote: > >> >> >> Am 25. M=C3=A4rz 2017 13:50:01 MEZ schrieb sebb > >: >> >On 25 March 2017 at 09:20, Philippe Mouawad >> >> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> What do you think of adding to bugzilla a new field "FIX VERSION" >> >which we >> >> would use to indicate in which version bug is fixed (JIRA has such >> >field). >> >> >> >> We could then use a search query to find all bugs fixed in any >> >version but >> >> also for upcoming release. >> >> We could then put this link in Nightly build page so that users know >> >what >> >> bugs/enhancements nightly build version contains. >> >> >> >> I think it would also make it clear in which version a bug was fixed. >> >> >> >> We would also create new version soon in the process, either we call >> >it >> >> 3.2-nightly or 3.2 (but how to indicate that version is not released >> >?). >> > >> >There are already nightly builds. >> >The Maven ones use the name 3.2-SNAPSHOT, and the files themselves >> >include a timestamp. >> >The Jenkins ones only include the revision, but it should be easy >> >enough to change that to include the target version number. >> >The CI ones make be a bit more awkard to rename because the index page >> >needs to be generated. >> >> I read it as Philippe meant to create tags to choose from in bugzilla. O= n >> the other hand, there is already a nightly tag, if I an not mistaken. >> >> Felix >> >> > >> >Note that only builds which have been voted on may be promoted to the >> >general public. >> > >> >> >> >> If you're ok, do we have to ask for that to Infra team ? >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Regards >> >> Philippe >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.