Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4119A200C38 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:23:42 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 3FCCC160B7E; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 5EF97160B7C for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:23:41 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 94512 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2017 23:23:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 94490 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2017 23:23:40 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:23:40 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id BEB071A03B7 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:23:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.88 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TyOaCXhyG3bS for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:23:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm0-f51.google.com (mail-wm0-f51.google.com [74.125.82.51]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A58DE5F36B for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:23:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f51.google.com with SMTP id v186so97389162wmd.0 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:23:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=97uz0/hqaS3QMvDFgulEJLLBikNOkweAngD1Blnt+Ms=; b=pQYT4QJxwWf6E1dm2JGpAArqsDcxXA5CScWlypKgxUbNU8Ck63bRJAuiZhywlQgCok RyWZ0XiDtiGpSrq3jBMxHbBJyGEnGc4e/u+StPQc4Iy5KzXu+QewmDeOd2ZOJG/w+iVN uUocwaQx+BAbocAVXXWn8L0000PYoijWVhbsIIyjtAI5jh8Jxc9ot5yvxgWEQRQHgL73 Zsu533nxNob28ytWj6+4FJ7Ru0d1xdSk9yIAs7H7g27C1XjrSZnZwXcVYYMj7WUaq0tt JFjD66SzlaXicolTAIMCHcB/SD/6JY3OuBaW30GrZY7j9bQ2tVcBwyucnh8vO6ttXwao 8LKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=97uz0/hqaS3QMvDFgulEJLLBikNOkweAngD1Blnt+Ms=; b=SvXcetbNitW6dW8csm2BjU4EZUcAJ51s6X8vVeMxgqouOW7DlsPPLfSb4e52jjYOVt G6xIzx26bgbJNTdNT/so4Zl9k8MMB/zKbC+T0h6liPWe6fXUNe6UWRADlnUw6QNc9cZ3 baGcdMajdiSuB9G+A412k1siAnyK2QqlYfZ8+KX42la5gk1I5pgp2x8mXzF3e+NSpfJw 2cim+rn+EPZLBhPM/8PZ6stCdvAjEO2sv2S+QkAHRZH1/qZuq6LE3SzHwm6AKn+J2/59 aevbE9SkF240pfn2wye3VLoLNZXNq2K3UNhDQmrCvMnebH0/ktEuo29Mp0ZpQsIi+ot9 6MaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lZEDdDVJuFRlCjYQ3QO24f8H1GB8nF5nNVgkiOdUSBm3bHoKDiPRlwUPhjWccTeo30InZQieaNOL+C2g== X-Received: by 10.28.28.69 with SMTP id c66mr845040wmc.28.1488324214065; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:23:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.169.48 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:23:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: sebb Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:23:33 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release a 3.2 To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 archived-at: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:23:42 -0000 On 28 February 2017 at 23:15, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > On Tuesday, February 28, 2017, sebb wrote: > >> On 28 February 2017 at 22:40, Philippe Mouawad >> > wrote: >> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:25 PM, sebb > >> wrote: >> > >> >> On 28 February 2017 at 22:06, Philippe Mouawad >> >> > wrote: >> >> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:01 PM, sebb > > wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On 28 February 2017 at 21:54, Philippe Mouawad >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> > Hello, >> >> >> > We're now at: >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - 48 Enhancements >> >> >> > - 31 bug fixes >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Sebb has fixed Windows failures on Jenkins >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - Ensure the migrated docs (from PDF) do not contain old "Urban >> >> >> legends" >> >> >> > :-) nor bad practices. Those are the 4 Tutorial links in left >> >> menu. It >> >> >> > would be nice to review them. I've fixed some but not done the >> full >> >> >> work >> >> >> > >> >> >> > TODO >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - Fill in introduced properties in properties_reference.xml >> >> >> >> >> >> Remove obsolete references (e.g. some logging ones ?) >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Which ones ? >> >> > I made the cleanup. >> >> > Did I forget something ? >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> Add logging documentation. >> >> >> >> >> > It has been done in properties_reference.xml >> >> >> >> There is only some mention of HttpClient logging there. >> >> >> >> I could not find any description as to how to set the level for a >> >> specific JMeter class. >> >> >> > >> > I think this is pretty easy to find on internet knowing we use log4j2 and >> > slf4j. >> > But if you think we should add some doc, feel free to do it. >> >> Sorry, but that is not good enough. >> I did not want the hassle of changing the logging. You did want the change. > > > It was an agreement from team. Not only me. You were the prime mover. > It's Apache way and boyscout rule :), it's not enough feel free to improve > it. > Search engine results seem good enough for me: > https://lite.qwant.com/?q=log4j2%20configure%20log > > > > > >> The change was agreed to on the basis that updated documentation was >> essential. >> >> There do not need to be reams of docs, but there should be at least >> couple of sentences as to how to configure the logging that will be >> readily understandable to someone used to the old ways. > > > What is the best place for it in your opinion ? In the user manual (getting started has some references to logging) with a link from jmeter.properties. Also needs details in changes.xml for the plugin writers. Where appropriate that can also point to the user manual. > I am not saying I'll write it though, as I have contributed already > important time on this. Someone has to do it. If it's not done, then the release should not go ahead. I did say at the outset that changing logging was going to be a lot of work. > > >> >> And plugin writers need to be told how to update their plugins. >> >> >> >> >> jmeter.properties used to describe this in some detail. >> >> The updated description probably does not belong there, but there >> >> should at least be a pointer to where to find the new information. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Remove remaining references to older logging API. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > Where ? >> >> > I thought I had done it >> >> >> >> The string log_level appears in quite a few places. >> >> AFAIK it is not used in the new scheme >> >> >> > I have removed them. >> > Let me know if I still missed something >> >> I don't know if there is anything else. >> I just happened to notice that reference. >> >> Thanks for pointing that > > >> > Thanks >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > DONE >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - If possible add JUnits on the regression introduced in GET >> with >> >> no >> >> >> > body (see my mail) >> >> >> > >> >> >> > DONE >> >> >> > >> >> >> > - Fill in New and Noteworthy section >> >> >> > >> >> >> > TODO >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Are you ok to start a release soon ? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Thanks >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Regards >> >> >> > >> >> >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM, sebb > > wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> I'm seeing some test failures on Windows. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've started to set up a Jenkins build to be able to catch these. >> >> >> >> (at present the failure mails are sent direct to me) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Depending on the cause, the failures need to be fixed before the >> next >> >> >> >> release. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 11 February 2017 at 10:22, Philippe Mouawad >> >> >> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hello, >> >> >> >> > Since our discussion on "Release a 3.2 ?" , trunk has nicely >> >> evolved: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > - 33 Enhancements >> >> >> >> > - 25 bug fixes >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I think we can now plan a release. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I see the following remaining work: >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > - Ensure the migrated docs (from PDF) do not contain old >> "Urban >> >> >> >> legends" >> >> >> >> > :-) nor bad practices. Those are the 4 Tutorial links in left >> >> >> menu. It >> >> >> >> > would be nice to review them. I've fixed some but not done >> the >> >> full >> >> >> >> work >> >> >> >> > - Fill in introduced properties in properties_reference.xml >> >> >> >> > - If possible add JUnits on the regression introduced in GET >> >> with >> >> >> no >> >> >> >> > body (see my mail) >> >> >> >> > - Fill in New and Noteworthy section >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> >> > Cordialement. >> >> >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > Cordialement. >> >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Cordialement. >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cordialement. >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.