Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC55D200C38 for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:15:17 +0100 (CET) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id DADE4160B7E; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:15:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CF44160B7C for ; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:15:16 +0100 (CET) Received: (qmail 71824 invoked by uid 500); 28 Feb 2017 23:15:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 71812 invoked by uid 99); 28 Feb 2017 23:15:15 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:15:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 714C7C0A71 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:15:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.18 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.18 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, KAM_NUMSUBJECT=0.5, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd1-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uMn-0phiAvEi for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f174.google.com (mail-qk0-f174.google.com [209.85.220.174]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1E3935F1EE for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f174.google.com with SMTP id n127so43867425qkf.0 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:15:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=/1b82CtqfVpboSVoAApw9QqNUG5xuZ4XoJmPpysuT40=; b=srP8vOjtq8uXFswLBi5SHuo22jm1uRY5FPgQ8SWt9z8DYoJfubdJrh93NXNYQraHqc 7vW9LxOb0r/au9bf6U8DDnYwj+WFe+763PesLjqQU+PgBOkNKEkngqJ9NtECMxiBt7gl kKEBxj3h6XLbPv44FKWkBVadsl6uAxvK0urldMXUdWH30dQdUwYgIFkIQawxWFBF/imn WyWzukSjMudm8EvhAdLDrlscTnnbRryqJ+jGDVjYLDPyL6XWylFP/iLkWiUnmpcXJ6WV QsA2+u2UzVvYmHueeuFd4kNRJFkpwZUp8gku3yYi4fQ+4SPFCD+9NoXcrxo2ZFNLXOpy kiVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=/1b82CtqfVpboSVoAApw9QqNUG5xuZ4XoJmPpysuT40=; b=sufjCwneAkX1VROC8KqDWuaz1uD9/VtqUg9Jw6QmncfvFCfa4Zh2bg440i9bUEQ6uG jl30Utr5Dumfxs/1n7BQfPmIPgKOD3HR9R24nJYhW6K0lgBjL60LKxRYcWQ7oIqSGfyv nkVaolUoH+u+eQF18W5he6jIp/bdwlG1UT84YijnRursN303LQHqBzlprP2GNGeyjsye RtPMR61a4xSQnxXzRefT7FveOuCwP9xB3+QbPLCPV3VlkQXf5uVDw9Q3EH58mqQAvQQ1 oHtNMDUoMQmiUSQnw8gfeHsb7bhg23MqLQasixlB9aH1BmWzbrAdXpxtm2fJaput7xrQ qndg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39msGpnXxX+QrmkUvBDxJWU+LL5rDzdbg+2q351L2th7PAUj868jvFw9CiefxyfWqOuGZRNWez6clZC1ng== X-Received: by 10.55.154.130 with SMTP id c124mr5706058qke.285.1488323708796; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:15:08 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.12.147.173 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Feb 2017 15:15:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Philippe Mouawad Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2017 00:15:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release a 3.2 To: "dev@jmeter.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c054d1ef945e705499f5d32 archived-at: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 23:15:18 -0000 --94eb2c054d1ef945e705499f5d32 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tuesday, February 28, 2017, sebb wrote: > On 28 February 2017 at 22:40, Philippe Mouawad > > wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:25 PM, sebb > > wrote: > > > >> On 28 February 2017 at 22:06, Philippe Mouawad > >> > wrote: > >> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:01 PM, sebb > wrote: > >> > > >> >> On 28 February 2017 at 21:54, Philippe Mouawad > >> >> > wrote: > >> >> > Hello, > >> >> > We're now at: > >> >> > > >> >> > - 48 Enhancements > >> >> > - 31 bug fixes > >> >> > > >> >> > Sebb has fixed Windows failures on Jenkins > >> >> > > >> >> > - Ensure the migrated docs (from PDF) do not contain old "Urban > >> >> legends" > >> >> > :-) nor bad practices. Those are the 4 Tutorial links in left > >> menu. It > >> >> > would be nice to review them. I've fixed some but not done the > full > >> >> work > >> >> > > >> >> > TODO > >> >> > > >> >> > - Fill in introduced properties in properties_reference.xml > >> >> > >> >> Remove obsolete references (e.g. some logging ones ?) > >> >> > >> > > >> > Which ones ? > >> > I made the cleanup. > >> > Did I forget something ? > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Add logging documentation. > >> >> > >> > It has been done in properties_reference.xml > >> > >> There is only some mention of HttpClient logging there. > >> > >> I could not find any description as to how to set the level for a > >> specific JMeter class. > >> > > > > I think this is pretty easy to find on internet knowing we use log4j2 and > > slf4j. > > But if you think we should add some doc, feel free to do it. > > Sorry, but that is not good enough. > I did not want the hassle of changing the logging. You did want the change. It was an agreement from team. Not only me. It's Apache way and boyscout rule :), it's not enough feel free to improve it. Search engine results seem good enough for me: https://lite.qwant.com/?q=log4j2%20configure%20log > The change was agreed to on the basis that updated documentation was > essential. > > There do not need to be reams of docs, but there should be at least > couple of sentences as to how to configure the logging that will be > readily understandable to someone used to the old ways. What is the best place for it in your opinion ? I am not saying I'll write it though, as I have contributed already important time on this. > > And plugin writers need to be told how to update their plugins. > > >> > >> jmeter.properties used to describe this in some detail. > >> The updated description probably does not belong there, but there > >> should at least be a pointer to where to find the new information. > >> > >> >> > >> >> Remove remaining references to older logging API. > >> >> > >> > > >> > Where ? > >> > I thought I had done it > >> > >> The string log_level appears in quite a few places. > >> AFAIK it is not used in the new scheme > >> > > I have removed them. > > Let me know if I still missed something > > I don't know if there is anything else. > I just happened to notice that reference. > > Thanks for pointing that > > Thanks > > > >> > >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > DONE > >> >> > > >> >> > - If possible add JUnits on the regression introduced in GET > with > >> no > >> >> > body (see my mail) > >> >> > > >> >> > DONE > >> >> > > >> >> > - Fill in New and Noteworthy section > >> >> > > >> >> > TODO > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > Are you ok to start a release soon ? > >> >> > > >> >> > Thanks > >> >> > > >> >> > Regards > >> >> > > >> >> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 4:21 PM, sebb > wrote: > >> >> > > >> >> >> I'm seeing some test failures on Windows. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> I've started to set up a Jenkins build to be able to catch these. > >> >> >> (at present the failure mails are sent direct to me) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> Depending on the cause, the failures need to be fixed before the > next > >> >> >> release. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> On 11 February 2017 at 10:22, Philippe Mouawad > >> >> >> > wrote: > >> >> >> > Hello, > >> >> >> > Since our discussion on "Release a 3.2 ?" , trunk has nicely > >> evolved: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > - 33 Enhancements > >> >> >> > - 25 bug fixes > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I think we can now plan a release. > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > I see the following remaining work: > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > - Ensure the migrated docs (from PDF) do not contain old > "Urban > >> >> >> legends" > >> >> >> > :-) nor bad practices. Those are the 4 Tutorial links in left > >> >> menu. It > >> >> >> > would be nice to review them. I've fixed some but not done > the > >> full > >> >> >> work > >> >> >> > - Fill in introduced properties in properties_reference.xml > >> >> >> > - If possible add JUnits on the regression introduced in GET > >> with > >> >> no > >> >> >> > body (see my mail) > >> >> >> > - Fill in New and Noteworthy section > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > -- > >> >> >> > Cordialement. > >> >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > -- > >> >> > Cordialement. > >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Cordialement. > >> > Philippe Mouawad. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Cordialement. > > Philippe Mouawad. > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. --94eb2c054d1ef945e705499f5d32--