jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2017 21:31:17 GMT
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 4:33 PM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0077@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> One more thing
>
> Release 3.2 will need Java 8. Is it the moment to switch to Nashorn Engine
> by default?
>
+1 for me but we need to make it clear wherever Javascript is used:

   - IfController
   - __javascript function
   - properties reference
   - jmeter.properties
   - changes.xml as Incompatible change



> Someone have made test with GC G1 to switch to it with the right parameter
> in 3.2 release?
>
I've commited some changes and refreshed some old links and code.
If anybody masters G1 , let him improve tuning.

I didn't test on windows so if somebody can test everything is ok.


>
> Thank
> Antonio
>
> 2017-01-16 10:13 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0077@gmail.com>:
>
> > Hi Philippe,
> >
> > Thanks to your job
> >
> > 2017-01-15 23:20 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> >> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> >> > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Am 12.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >> >>
> >> >>> Hello,
> >> >>> What do you think of releasing a 3.2 version ?
> >> >>>
> >> >> I think I said before, that I would like to release often :)
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I see following reasons:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     - There is a regression (See bug 60575)
> >> >>>
> >> >> My fix for 60575 needs tests and review as it changes the contract
of
> >> the
> >> >> method getSendParameterValuesAsPostBody.
> >> >>
> >> > I reviewed it , it looks ok to me.
> >> > I'll double check.
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> It returned true if there were no parameters (and thus none with a
> >> name).
> >> >> (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true)
> >> >>
> >> >> After the change it returns only true when there are parameters and
> >> none
> >> >> of those have a name. (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true).
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> This method is used in POST and PUT as well, but I believe the change
> >> to
> >> >> be correct in both places. too.
> >> >>
> >> >>     - We have 9 enhancements and 12  Bug fixes
> >> >>>     - Some nice features (at least as a current user I find them
> >> >>> interesting
> >> >>>     :-) ):
> >> >>>        - More space in UI and simpler look
> >> >>>        - Up to date Browser based on javafx
> >> >>>
> >> >> We might have to warn a bit more about the need for javafx (The
> default
> >> >> java for SUSE Leap42.2 seems to have no javafx). Without javafx
> JMeter
> >> will
> >> >> start, but the results tree view is missing.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I think in this case we should try to fail in a bit cleaner way
> >> >
> >>
> >> Done through bug  60583
> >> Still, not fully satisfied with solution as we catch a
> >> NoClassDefFoundError
> >> (I'll send a mail on this)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>        - Or in response assertion
> >> >>>        - Replace feature (partial)+ counting
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Maybe we can integrate before next release:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     - PR-247
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> If somebody can take it into account. I'm pausing for now.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> >     - PR-246
> >> >>>
> >> >> Done with some changes.
> >> We can improve in the future by:
> >>
> >>    - Using HttpComponents HttpAsyncClient
> >>    - Make some properties configurable
> >>
> >>
> >>     - PR-245
> >> >>>
> >> >> Done with some changes
> >>
> >> >     - PR-237
> >> >>>
> >> >> Done
> >>
> >> >
> >> >>> And upgrade some dependencies:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>     - jodd which has a lot of perf enhancements that we use in
> JMeter
> >> >>> (for
> >> >>>     resources extractions)
> >> >>>     - httpcomponents
> >> >>>     - maybe more
> >> >>>
> >> >> Done
> >>
> >> I'd also like to commit :
> >>
> >>    - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60514
> >>
> >>
> >> I would like to link  the converted pdf tutorials and maybe do a bit of
> >> >> minor tweaks to the look and feel of the web pages (less shadows).
> >> >>
> >> >> Should the sect-num number of the tutorials be continued from those
> in
> >> >> the usermanual section?
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > I think so.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>> Besides, we did a lot of code changes related to sonar, let's
> release
> >> it.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> A last good thing is that we start to release more often.
> >> >>>
> >> >> +1
> >> >>
> >> >> Felix
> >> >>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cordialement.
> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cordialement.
> >> Philippe Mouawad.
> >>
> >
> >
>



-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message