jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Maxime Chassagneux <maxime.chassagn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?
Date Fri, 13 Jan 2017 09:35:44 GMT
Hi,

Pls, could you consider to merge this PR too :

 - PR-241 : Support variable for all JMS messages (bytes, object, ...) and
sources (file, folder)
 - PR-240 : Improves JMS component robustness

Thanks .

2017-01-12 21:02 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:

> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
> > Am 12.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >> What do you think of releasing a 3.2 version ?
> >>
> > I think I said before, that I would like to release often :)
> >
> >>
> >> I see following reasons:
> >>
> >>     - There is a regression (See bug 60575)
> >>
> > My fix for 60575 needs tests and review as it changes the contract of the
> > method getSendParameterValuesAsPostBody.
> >
> I reviewed it , it looks ok to me.
> I'll double check.
>
> >
> > It returned true if there were no parameters (and thus none with a name).
> > (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true)
> >
> > After the change it returns only true when there are parameters and none
> > of those have a name. (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true).
> >
>
>
>
> >
> > This method is used in POST and PUT as well, but I believe the change to
> > be correct in both places. too.
> >
> >     - We have 9 enhancements and 12  Bug fixes
> >>     - Some nice features (at least as a current user I find them
> >> interesting
> >>     :-) ):
> >>        - More space in UI and simpler look
> >>        - Up to date Browser based on javafx
> >>
> > We might have to warn a bit more about the need for javafx (The default
> > java for SUSE Leap42.2 seems to have no javafx). Without javafx JMeter
> will
> > start, but the results tree view is missing.
> >
>
> I think in this case we should try to fail in a bit cleaner way
>
> >        - Or in response assertion
> >>        - Replace feature (partial)+ counting
> >>
> >> Maybe we can integrate before next release:
> >>
> >>     - PR-247
> >>     - PR-246
> >>     - PR-245
> >>     - PR-237
> >>
> >> And upgrade some dependencies:
> >>
> >>     - jodd which has a lot of perf enhancements that we use in JMeter
> (for
> >>     resources extractions)
> >>     - httpcomponents
> >>     - maybe more
> >>
> > I would like to link  the converted pdf tutorials and maybe do a bit of
> > minor tweaks to the look and feel of the web pages (less shadows).
> >
> > Should the sect-num number of the tutorials be continued from those in
> the
> > usermanual section?
> >
>
> I think so.
>
>
> >> Besides, we did a lot of code changes related to sonar, let's release
> it.
> >>
> >> A last good thing is that we start to release more often.
> >>
> > +1
> >
> > Felix
> >
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message