jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Release JMeter 3.2 ?
Date Mon, 16 Jan 2017 15:33:21 GMT
Hi,

One more thing

Release 3.2 will need Java 8. Is it the moment to switch to Nashorn Engine
by default?

Someone have made test with GC G1 to switch to it with the right parameter
in 3.2 release?

Thank
Antonio

2017-01-16 10:13 GMT+01:00 Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0077@gmail.com>:

> Hi Philippe,
>
> Thanks to your job
>
> 2017-01-15 23:20 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>> > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Am 12.01.2017 um 20:39 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>> >>
>> >>> Hello,
>> >>> What do you think of releasing a 3.2 version ?
>> >>>
>> >> I think I said before, that I would like to release often :)
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> I see following reasons:
>> >>>
>> >>>     - There is a regression (See bug 60575)
>> >>>
>> >> My fix for 60575 needs tests and review as it changes the contract of
>> the
>> >> method getSendParameterValuesAsPostBody.
>> >>
>> > I reviewed it , it looks ok to me.
>> > I'll double check.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> It returned true if there were no parameters (and thus none with a
>> name).
>> >> (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true)
>> >>
>> >> After the change it returns only true when there are parameters and
>> none
>> >> of those have a name. (Or if getPostBodyRaw() is true).
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >>
>> >> This method is used in POST and PUT as well, but I believe the change
>> to
>> >> be correct in both places. too.
>> >>
>> >>     - We have 9 enhancements and 12  Bug fixes
>> >>>     - Some nice features (at least as a current user I find them
>> >>> interesting
>> >>>     :-) ):
>> >>>        - More space in UI and simpler look
>> >>>        - Up to date Browser based on javafx
>> >>>
>> >> We might have to warn a bit more about the need for javafx (The default
>> >> java for SUSE Leap42.2 seems to have no javafx). Without javafx JMeter
>> will
>> >> start, but the results tree view is missing.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think in this case we should try to fail in a bit cleaner way
>> >
>>
>> Done through bug  60583
>> Still, not fully satisfied with solution as we catch a
>> NoClassDefFoundError
>> (I'll send a mail on this)
>>
>>
>>
>>        - Or in response assertion
>> >>>        - Replace feature (partial)+ counting
>> >>>
>> >>> Maybe we can integrate before next release:
>> >>>
>> >>>     - PR-247
>> >>>
>> >>
>> If somebody can take it into account. I'm pausing for now.
>>
>>
>>
>> >     - PR-246
>> >>>
>> >> Done with some changes.
>> We can improve in the future by:
>>
>>    - Using HttpComponents HttpAsyncClient
>>    - Make some properties configurable
>>
>>
>>     - PR-245
>> >>>
>> >> Done with some changes
>>
>> >     - PR-237
>> >>>
>> >> Done
>>
>> >
>> >>> And upgrade some dependencies:
>> >>>
>> >>>     - jodd which has a lot of perf enhancements that we use in JMeter
>> >>> (for
>> >>>     resources extractions)
>> >>>     - httpcomponents
>> >>>     - maybe more
>> >>>
>> >> Done
>>
>> I'd also like to commit :
>>
>>    - https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60514
>>
>>
>> I would like to link  the converted pdf tutorials and maybe do a bit of
>> >> minor tweaks to the look and feel of the web pages (less shadows).
>> >>
>> >> Should the sect-num number of the tutorials be continued from those in
>> >> the usermanual section?
>> >>
>> >
>> > I think so.
>> >
>> >
>> >>> Besides, we did a lot of code changes related to sonar, let's release
>> it.
>> >>>
>> >>> A last good thing is that we start to release more often.
>> >>>
>> >> +1
>> >>
>> >> Felix
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cordialement.
>> > Philippe Mouawad.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message