jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Date Sun, 30 Oct 2016 22:25:44 GMT
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:47 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:

> As remaining work for 3.1, I have in mind this:
>
>    - It would be nice to deprecated BSF elements
>
> I will do it tomorrow

>
>    - Upgrade somes jars , I think there was releases of Apache libraries
>    that we use
>
> Done.

>
>    - Update some screenshots for listener that have been affected by
>    changes
>    - Include https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57305 and
>    some code sample (I don't know where). Wyatt and Felix have spent some time
>    on this, it would be nice to include it before 3.1
>
> Done by Felix

>
>    - Maybe document what properties to disable when generating a report
>    with default 3.0 properties using a 3.1 version
>       - jmeter.save.saveservice.connect_time=false
>       - #jmeter.save.saveservice.sent_bytes=false
>
>
> Bon courage !
>
> Regards
>
> Philippe
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Milamber,
>> 3.1 is not a "small" improvement release and should not be presented like
>> this in my opinion.
>> It is a medium to major release:
>>
>>    - 54 Enhancements
>>    - 28 Bug fixes
>>
>>
>> There is a lot of new important features:
>>
>>    - New sent bytes metric computed and available in reports
>>    - Enabled connect metric developed by Andrei in previous version and
>>    now available in Report
>>    - Ability to handle big responses. In the era of video, big images...
>>    I think it's important to highlight
>>    - Handling of CLOBs / Blobs
>>    - __groovy function which allows now users to fully abandon Beanshell
>>    and gain performances and Groovy features
>>    - Many Report / Dashboard fixes and improvements (The screenshots
>>    need to be updated, I unfortunately won't be able to do that before 31/10) *AND
>>    *:
>>       - new Top5 Errors by sampler table in Dashboard
>>       - new "Response Time Overview" graph
>>       - new "Connect Time Over Time " graph
>>       - new report containing min/max and percentiles graphs
>>       - Active Threads Over Time stack lines
>>
>> In addition to these features, big number of fixes and nice improvements:
>>
>>    - JSON Extractor
>>    - UX in CSV Dataset,
>>    - Sane HTML viewer
>>    - Performance and memory improvements
>>    - ....
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:54 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>>>
>>> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even
>>> if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Thank to the answer
>>>>
>>>> On my side, it's ok too
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> >:
>>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>>>
>>>>>     - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>>>     - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>>>> increase
>>>>>     precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release
will
>>>>>>>>> only
>>>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building),
I can
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too
far which I
>>>>>>>>> am
>>>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release
and
>>>>>>>> hoping
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> for
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>   Felix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues
<
>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming
release.
>>>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have
no real
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>>>
>>>>>> on
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad
<
>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes
Rodrigues <
>>>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad
<
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate
the new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen
in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance
improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't
see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM,
Milamber <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber
wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start
the next release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>
>>>>>> 2
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep
the Java 7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will
must be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before
the next release, please
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cordialement.
>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message