jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 10:03:24 GMT
Great :-)

Antonio

2016-10-21 11:54 GMT+02:00 Milamber <milamber@apache.org>:

>
> I can start the RC1 the 30 oct. or 31 oct as RM.
>
> In waiting, we can start to add some New and Noteworthy screenshots even
> if the 3.1 release is small improvement release.
>
>
>
> On 21/10/2016 09:16, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thank to the answer
>>
>> On my side, it's ok too
>>
>> Antonio
>>
>> 2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hello,
>>> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
>>> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>>>
>>>     - JSON : Felix has a patch
>>>     - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to
>>> increase
>>>     precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Philippe
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
>>>>
>>>> Antonio
>>>>
>>>> 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>> :
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will
only
>>>>>>> support Java 8.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building),
I can
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> this
>>>>
>>>>> way
>>>>>>> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
>>>>>>> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which
I am
>>>>>>> afraid
>>>>>>> will not be the case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and
hoping
>>>>>>
>>>>> for
>>>>
>>>>> a short period till the next release.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
>>>>> But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>   Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Antonio
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>
>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
>>>>>>>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> visibility
>>>
>>>> on
>>>>
>>>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues
<
>>>>>>>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the
new release of jodd
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> which
>>>>
>>>>> contains an important performance improvement. It is supposed
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> be
>>>>
>>>>> released in few days.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you know when?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance
improvement?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> It may not be simple.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber
<
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> milamber@apache.org>
>>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you ok?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next
release process withing 1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>
>>>> 2
>>>>
>>>>> weeks?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> can act as RM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java
7 support (probably this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> will
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must
be fixed before the next
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you want add an improvement before the
next release, please
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> indicate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message