jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <ra0...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Start the next release 3.1 into 1-2 weeks?
Date Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:16:07 GMT
Hi,

Thank to the answer

On my side, it's ok too

Antonio

2016-10-20 22:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>:

> Hello,
> On my side, I consider work finished for this version.
> AFAIK there are 2 pending issues:
>
>    - JSON : Felix has a patch
>    - Issue reported yesterday by milamber : A rapid fix can be to increase
>    precision (not blocker as here since 2.13)
>
>
> Regards
> Philippe
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> ra0077@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The release of 3.1 is it still planned?
> >
> > Antonio
> >
> > 2016-10-07 19:42 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 7:40 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> > > felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Am 07.10.2016 um 19:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello,
> > > >> Meanwhile jodd manager gave me some feedback, next release will only
> > > >> support Java 8.
> > > >>
> > > >> So we can either decide to migrate to Java8 (only building), I can
> > this
> > > >> way
> > > >> include the new Browser feature and this new version.
> > > >> Or we stick to Java 7 hoping that next 3.2 is not too far which I
am
> > > >> afraid
> > > >> will not be the case.
> > > >>
> > > > I am still in favour of staying on java 7 for this release and hoping
> > for
> > > > a short period till the next release.
> > > >
> > > > I think we can live with the poor(er) performance of jodd.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I wanted to introduce the new Browser faster also.
> > > But Ok let's stick to Java 7 :-)
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >  Felix
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Philippe
> > > >>
> > > >> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues <
> > > >> ra0077@gmail.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Antonio
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2016-10-02 21:33 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > > philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > > >>> >:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Hello
> > > >>>> Work on my side is finished for 3.1 upcoming release.
> > > >>>> Except for jsoup and jodd upgrade but as we have no real
> visibility
> > on
> > > >>>> release we might decide to proceed with 3.1 release process.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Regards
> > > >>>> Philippe
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
> > > >>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Antonio Gomes Rodrigues
<
> > > >>>>> ra0077@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Hi,
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> 2016-09-27 23:43 GMT+02:00 Philippe Mouawad <
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> :
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>> I would like if possible to integrate the new
release of jodd
> > which
> > > >>>>>>> contains an important performance improvement.
It is supposed
> to
> > be
> > > >>>>>>> released in few days.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Do you know when?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> No, he said last week it would happen in 2 weeks.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Have you got a link which explain the performance improvement?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/328
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/327
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/329
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/330
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/issues/331
> > > >>>>> https://github.com/oblac/jodd/pull/332
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On my side I would like if possible to fix:
> > > >>>>>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60015
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> +1 to wait to the fix
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> It may not be simple.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I have asked a question on dev mailing list.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I have seen your mail but I don't see question
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> I was waiting for remarks on analysis.
> > > >>>>> I may not have the whole picture.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>> But if too complex we can wait for 3.2
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> Regards
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:40 PM, Milamber <
> milamber@apache.org>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Ready? I can start the RC1 the 2nd October?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Are you ok?
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Milamber
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> On 13/09/2016 15:20, Milamber wrote:
> > > >>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> Hello,
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Are you willing to start the next release
process withing 1
> to
> > 2
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> weeks?
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> can act as RM.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> The next release will keep the Java 7
support (probably this
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> release
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> will
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> be the last with Java 7 support).
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> What are the bugs which will must be fixed
before the next
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> release?
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> If you want add an improvement before the next release, please
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>> indicate
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> now.
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>> Milamber
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> --
> > > >>>>>>> Cordialement.
> > > >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> --
> > > >>>>> Cordialement.
> > > >>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>> --
> > > >>>> Cordialement.
> > > >>>> Philippe Mouawad.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Cordialement.
> > > Philippe Mouawad.
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message