Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C785200B6F for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:48:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 8AE97160AB1; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:48:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id D1DCD160A91 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:48:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 70369 invoked by uid 500); 24 Aug 2016 14:48:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 70356 invoked by uid 99); 24 Aug 2016 14:48:34 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:48:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 3D45D1A72CA for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:48:34 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-eu.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OZX9HPPi7pRW for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:48:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-it0-f54.google.com (mail-it0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1-lw-eu.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-eu.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 1871760D25 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:48:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f54.google.com with SMTP id f6so37466855ith.0 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 07:48:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=K577/s4dZfpm0/outXk84sdAX9LTYbk5/l6KxSjeATY=; b=WQPazcNJ/GF3JAkx2R+qPvXl94oW+F3akq+onUq8sWetntOQWM5Nw2bHmYLqGQJah/ on6mnrcnuEeZTc/2OS5BW+IGS8o1fSEhBIIPSc7XkQPJ0S5LjHg3frLdUSWTF1JAuNY+ 2PMxYS/9LipyvQ/+qzhOF+8htgCqxpvXga3DFUpRPsXw0QQhK32ssaghIHCmENjdXxdj 7bw9RADhQn+pPs8EKiyHlrDZQUS6cBC62ytWSPT7eAnABCMoMLlln7Kr1BAyElB8P66n 4zWuTj/h+J6E5jMITABaOh2Ak4FjHX9HcGi4VtZVVENFM0nHjKiOPKJcGoE2nfzlOiqS ntig== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=K577/s4dZfpm0/outXk84sdAX9LTYbk5/l6KxSjeATY=; b=i63JajelfelEHopTjakicHJSmRhSMZODMY0WOAMSt0VCopDtuaMp8nxL40qznrXDn1 Wru7fs+Imu757mP0z+ukCHlcvZUbTLWHT6Q+Bmc2nHxJnQCu36M6JCSVelzfe91x/L0s Mr0NvfVNYqn483UqghKLta8u5LgwYSaUSMrbBxsIrNjhDclBER9lCy5ZKwTnWdI+Ry0h QVOXO45n6bypDaRR6Pwp3gS2x4RiFCKNVdKzcjRcQ171GKIR1+5LlB0ZLFfeVujlpQEA 7ruufcvouNYPJPbMnuvFrE2SpKghOP+Y4gVahrT/tYdaUuIliHtCs+3r3t2eajVwXpQ4 LBQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuHvwjf/56EuhI505kaQP0GVHc4NPw02I49Ean2EapRdwpC9URJJi/QA1bcIZoVN+RNsAY0NNRSuxFfDA== X-Received: by 10.36.110.196 with SMTP id w187mr4989193itc.28.1472050103982; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 07:48:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Vladimir Sitnikov Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:48:13 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Comparison of Parsing results 2.13 vs 3.0 To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114abfb28a27c6053ad25feb archived-at: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:48:36 -0000 --001a114abfb28a27c6053ad25feb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 There's "recursive image download" issue at the end of the article (see ~ https://yandex.ru/clck/redir/dtype=stred....7004fcb3793e79bb1ac9e&keyno=12) Basically JMeter tries to download image, and the server responds with HTML page with the same image inside. Does it have something to do with wrong accept-type header? I'm not sure if JMeter sends "accept-type: image/whatever". PS. The article is hard to read as it just throws data on the table, and lists little conclusions. Vladimir --001a114abfb28a27c6053ad25feb--