jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <>
Subject Re: Axis of Performance improvement of Resource Download ?
Date Thu, 11 Aug 2016 19:14:49 GMT
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 9:05 PM, Vladimir Sitnikov <> wrote:

> 1) Regarding content hashing there might be a question which hash function
> we should use.
> For instance, there's
> that
> offers fast implementations of some hash functions.
> FarmHash, CityHash, MurmurHash3
> We might want to apply it to other "MD5" usages.

good idea

> 2)
> Philippe>this has a certain CPU impact related to HTML parsing to extract
> the links.
> Do you have some numbers that represent "certainty"?

"certain"  in my sentence does not mean "certainty" :-) at least from what
I understand in english.
It more means "an impact of a certain degree".
No numbers, more of reasoning that Parsing (based on Jodd or JSoup) comes
at the cost of Regexp parsing, which I think has certainly :-) a cost right

> 3) Re "cache HTML parsing", it does not sound to be very useful. Typical
> pages I see have different content, so the cache there does not sound
> promising

That was my doubt. But take an ecommerce website where part of users are
navigating anonymously, don't you think an important part of the pages is
similar ?
- product page
- home page
- category page

Isn't why webperf SAAS exist ? I would say around 20% at least would be the
same. Maybe user could indicate in a way when to optimize and when not ?

> 4) What if we implement "fetch links only during the first sampler
> execution"?

Can you give more details on your idea ?

> As far as I understand, the idea of "fetching resources automatically" is
> that users do not have to hard-code the resources right into jmx.
> It might be OK if we implement Cache<TestElement, List<URL>> kind of thing.
> Vladimir

Philippe Mouawad.

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message