jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Philippe Mouawad <philippe.moua...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] new logo for JMeter 3.0
Date Fri, 01 Apr 2016 20:00:31 GMT
Hi Felix,
I applied the changes I mentioned.
Regards
Philippe

On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:12 PM, Philippe Mouawad <
philippe.mouawad@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Felix.
> Regarding the social media links the are located at the bottom and not
> really visible as not above the floating line.
> I would prefer them to be visible without scrolling.
> Maybe it could be in About section which we could change :
>
>    - to remove "JMeter on Twitter <http://twitter.com/ApacheJMeter>" as
>    it's already in the other links,
>    - Put issues section in Community
>    - Put "Project info at Apache
>    <https://projects.apache.org/project.html?jmeter>" section in Community
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:07 PM, Felix Schumacher <
> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 30.03.2016 um 20:04 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>
>>> Am 30.03.2016 um 08:25 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>
>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>> When do you plan to commit the new logo so that it's used by JMeter site
>>>> and application ?
>>>>
>>> I hope to do so tomorrow.
>>>
>> I have committed the changes for the logo.
>>
>> The social media links are placed inside a div in nav. I am not sure,
>> whether it should stay there, or not. Any ideas?
>>
>> Felix
>>
>>
>>
>>> Regards,
>>>  Felix
>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:10 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Yes that's would be a good choice for update/refresh the JMeter identity
>>>>> design.
>>>>>
>>>>> Milamber
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 23/03/2016 22:31, sebb wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed, let's just go with 6.
>>>>>> Most people seem happy with it; I don't think anyone is against it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 March 2016 at 19:36, Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks Felix.
>>>>>>> Looks fair to me.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wednesday, March 23, 2016, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 23.03.2016 um 15:29 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anybody computed the results ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If every mail counts as a vote (NaveenKumar sent his
vote twice
>>>>>>>>> and I
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> counted it only once, sebb gave two votes with no preference,
so I
>>>>>>>> counted
>>>>>>>> both :) then we have two winners 3 and 6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If I take the preferences into account (first counts as two
votes,
>>>>>>>> second
>>>>>>>> as one (again sebb counts both times as two)) 6 wins.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The same is true if I take the first three preferences into
account
>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>> 3, 2 and 1 as a factor.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So I guess it is 6.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Does anyone else wants to give a formula to calculate a winner?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As per the vote through modernballots, logo 6 seems to be
the
>>>>>>>> winner:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://modernballots.com/elections/frmtk7nk/view/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But as sebb wrote it is not controlled and people can
vote as many
>>>>>>>>> times
>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>> they want.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Monday, March 14, 2016, NaveenKumar Namachivayam <
>>>>>>>>> catchnaveen.psgtech@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for Number 3
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:32 AM, Marko Vlahovic <
>>>>>>>>>> vlahovic74@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3  too.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> thanks
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:33 AM, Nachiket Kate
<
>>>>>>>>>>> nachiket.kate@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for number 3.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 11.03.2016 um 23:46 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix has created a new set of Logos for
JMeter 3.0.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> All variants can be seen on
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please start voting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jmeter6, jmeter4, jmeter3 (in 3 I would
colour TM  grey).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Philippe M.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> NaveenKumar N
>>>>>>>>>> Visit www.QAInsights.com and www.Testifications.com
and
>>>>>>>>>> www.MyTechCube.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cordialement.
>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement.
> Philippe Mouawad.
>
>
>


-- 
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message