Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Subject: Re: New logo for JMeter 3.0 Was: Remaining Work before Release of 3.0
To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
References: 
 <CAH9fUpbK2GQPCi2f_iUaNB66vjSrTpXNXjDBasb2atKf_ReUfg@mail.gmail.com>
 <56DDCF82.30104@internetallee.de>
 <CAH9fUpYp4nO=k1s=0PKV4K+5rTHAzWrfOLJv502msK=4Ohm9oQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <56DDE8E4.5050604@internetallee.de> <56DDEB8C.3090207@apache.org>
 <56DDEE51.9050101@internetallee.de> <56DDF04F.3070909@apache.org>
 <56DF27CC.4010905@internetallee.de>
From: Felix Schumacher <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de>
Message-ID: <56DF2C74.1080007@internetallee.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:48:04 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56DF27CC.4010905@internetallee.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

All variants can be seen on http://home.apache.org/~fschumacher/

Felix

Am 08.03.2016 um 20:28 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
> Am 07.03.2016 um 22:19 schrieb Milamber:
>>
>> Ok looks seems better smoothly
>>
>> Can you try with the jmeter2.svg border color was the inside color? 
>> and TM with the light gray. (just for compare the 3 and next 4)
> And now I have filled the TM with the same gray as the hidden TM in 
> the feather.
>
> Felix
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> On 07/03/2016 21:10, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>> Am 07.03.2016 um 21:58 schrieb Milamber:
>>>>
>>>> Oh, second logo (jmeter2.svg) is punchy and great!
>>>> Perhaps try a version with J and Meter char border with the same 
>>>> color of 'inside' char (no border) (using the inside color as the 
>>>> border too)
>>>>
>>>> (and reduce a little the size of TM mark)
>>> Version with Border color == Inside color and smaller TM.
>>>
>>> Felix
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 07/03/2016 20:47, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>>> Am 07.03.2016 um 21:26 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 7:59 PM, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>> felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 27.02.2016 um 11:06 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>> I had a look at bugs, enhancements and pending mailing lists 
>>>>>>>> discussions.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> After release of HttpClient 4.5.2, we are now ready to finalize 
>>>>>>>> the 3.0
>>>>>>>> version.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I added a Tag "fix_before_3.0" on issues that are pending :
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Should we adapt the logo to the new feather?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> if you have design skills why not :-) ?
>>>>> Skill is relative.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have attached two versions of an adapted logo.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>  Felix
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Here is the list:
>>>>>>>> 59083     JMeter     HTTP     NEW     ---     HTTP Request : 
>>>>>>>> Make Method
>>>>>>>> field editable so that additional methods (Webdav) can be added 
>>>>>>>> easily  =>
>>>>>>>> PATCH nearly ready to be commited
>>>>>>>> 59038     JMeter     HTTP     NEW     --- Deprecate HTTPClient 3.1
>>>>>>>> related elements => Some deprecation work to do
>>>>>>>> 59033     JMeter     HTTP     NEW     --- Parallel Download : 
>>>>>>>> Add CSS
>>>>>>>> Parsing to extract links from CSS files     => Patch Part1 
>>>>>>>> ready to
>>>>>>>> commit,
>>>>>>>> we could stop for now and complete it in 3.1 by adding an 
>>>>>>>> implementation
>>>>>>>> similar to HTMLRegexParser that extracts url()
>>>>>>>> 58986     JMeter     Main     REOP     --- Report/Dashboard 
>>>>>>>> reuses the
>>>>>>>> same output directory
>>>>>>>> => Waiting for sebb answer, not a lot of work
>>>>>>>> 58807     JMeter     HTTP     NEED     ---
>>>>>>>> https.use.cached.ssl.context=false is broken
>>>>>>>> => Patch waiting to be commited
>>>>>>>> 57182     JMeter     Main     NEW     ---     Better defaults : 
>>>>>>>> Save idle
>>>>>>>> time by default
>>>>>>>> => Not mandatory
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will work on:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      - 59038
>>>>>>>>      - 58986 if you are ok with my solution last comment on bug
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Besides this we had some documentation update:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      - Screenshots
>>>>>>>>      - New and Noteworthy section which should be very rich
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Once this is done, for release, what do you think of the 
>>>>>>>> following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>      - We send on user mailing list and twitter a message to 
>>>>>>>> ask users to
>>>>>>>>      test nightly build and wait for 1 week for feedback
>>>>>>>>      - We then start the release process
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Philippe
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>