Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 47A2618723 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 55136 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2016 08:12:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 55111 invoked by uid 500); 27 Feb 2016 08:12:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 55099 invoked by uid 99); 27 Feb 2016 08:12:49 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd2-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:12:49 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd2-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd2-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 75D751A08C5 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:12:49 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd2-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.179 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd2-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd2-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.9]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zwJaQXbZCcCI for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:12:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) by mx1-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id C583B5F20C for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 08:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qk0-f177.google.com with SMTP id x1so40317650qkc.1 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 00:12:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=BUj0dL9pdvmM6KvpFp555ZXR/1eUdAakPlDsflb6b70=; b=e2qd83esTEp3nhP/ft9wBnAGzjKcySe4op35aVEOydQSZf6L8gwJQXvWt0d+Vcjw+v Ngn0YgV2gf0EP0LuFiO9i5iQ1ep4udjJost39T0bYsZqeQTftcKnEzRO5CRhRPKRfMQo 2/M6PagVAisre02G4bFdhLpXAB+NaHNui8pq5055yotmhTeUvZy9lEdfihaf0sy5xoaa NTEQrn+q9Kd7FGn0euhNMLPTsEeLEoY3OMknkxaSYo07IyPGM7zHBoRBu3emOBIZfU+e 6I8GqybAyVZTXbvRF8KHJkA0Hmmvb/4d00Idc3ckWkdrC2pHubQ1Wl8iqj4W3ZssNmwy tSjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=BUj0dL9pdvmM6KvpFp555ZXR/1eUdAakPlDsflb6b70=; b=l5A//R63NioRG6MHytgyngtju2Nkm9l4kke0iB1Hl9HuWdBeSj86e/s2ChH5K7SD9d GwvjNJczjrAI44VS9+56q5ggpAFfJPA2YoFNgfS1KGteMi9Cm38QgwTUpK1mcQNvWTez JPTCW7HP2cCCwxIhkNMDA64+b+DSsNoWrVu5FYU5UidWZhuSnCBSl3Vt07mdYqZOUQZf tCt+cbS9oRJNihTnmEA3vOA6oSE5Z4nXYhbsBhISOoV11kc0DoYoxWgUJhPckUHxtRsJ w05nyM8y3K4ehpMay4Knvyibr0la/+upB5/mUx+qVOU5PqZ1Ge24IvS7YK4SX60ik9WJ 50nA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJXV/XMJsJTQ1l37/wsRDZreqpa4Tdad+qxfukATqlDYdJspH1l3aDW42PIFrFu6G2EoUQUPoeGH9+W+w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.192.89 with SMTP id o86mr7184074qki.31.1456560767360; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 00:12:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.55.116.65 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Feb 2016 00:12:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <5669272A.9010609@kippdata.de> <5682650D.4080801@kippdata.de> Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 09:12:47 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What about releasing a 2.14 ? From: Philippe Mouawad To: "dev@jmeter.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1149aaea21e59a052cbbfbe2 --001a1149aaea21e59a052cbbfbe2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Rainer, It appears you're very busy. Anybody had a chance to test and review code ? Thanks On Wednesday, January 6, 2016, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > Hi Rainer, > Did you have time to test ? > Thanks > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Rainer Jung > wrote: > >> I hope later today. >> >> Thanks for the fix in any case! >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> >> >> Am 29.12.2015 um 09:24 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> >>> Hi Rainer, all, >>> Anybody had a chance to review and test code ? >>> >>> Thx >>> >>> On Sunday, December 27, 2015, Philippe Mouawad < >>> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com >>> > >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Rainer, >>>> I think I fixed with Revision: 1721771 the bug >>>> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57804. >>>> Could you have a look and test. >>>> >>>> Beside this, I notice a change in the logs in the NoClientCert test case >>>> attached between 2.13 and 2.14, I cannot tell if it's a bug or regular. >>>> >>>> If you compare nohup-2.14-pre-commit-1721771-no-client-cert.log with >>>> nohup-2.13-no-client-cert.log. >>>> >>>> With 2.13 I see only 1 time => *** ClientHello, TLSv1 >>>> With 2.14 I see 4 times => *** ClientHello, TLSv1, but preceded the 3 >>>> last >>>> times with => %% Try resuming [Session-1, >>>> TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA] from port 2571 >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Philippe M. >>>> @philmdot >>>> >>> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. --001a1149aaea21e59a052cbbfbe2--