jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1664885 - /jmeter/trunk/xdocs/css/new-style.css
Date Sun, 08 Mar 2015 12:47:38 GMT
On 8 March 2015 at 09:07, Felix Schumacher
<felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 08.03.2015 um 00:26 schrieb sebb:
>>
>> On 7 March 2015 at 17:50, Felix Schumacher
>> <felix.schumacher@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 07.03.2015 um 18:37 schrieb sebb:
>>>>
>>>> On 7 March 2015 at 16:24,  <fschumacher@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Author: fschumacher
>>>>> Date: Sat Mar  7 16:24:00 2015
>>>>> New Revision: 1664885
>>>>>
>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1664885
>>>>> Log:
>>>>> Try to make the header as small as possible. It could be that the
>>>>> apache
>>>>> ad will get cut off, if the ad uses the full height
>>>>
>>>> There are other sizes of ad, for example
>>>>
>>>> http://www.apache.org/ads/ApacheCon/2015-na-234x60.png
>>>>
>>>> The 125x125 one was originally chosen for the LHS menu because it is
>>>> more suitable for that orientation.
>>>
>>> I have put the bannerbar.html into the test pages at
>>> p.a.o/~fschumacher/jmeter
>>> While it makes the header use less height, it seems to be problematic on
>>> small devices.
>>
>> Is it worse on small devices than banner.html?
>> If so, why is that?
>
> The square one would fit in a half wide div. The wide one would stand out at
> the right end and make the page seems bigger, which leads to a scrollable
> page.

Only on quite narrow devices.

>>
>> And does it really matter if smaller devices don't display well -
>> there's generally too much content anyway.
>
> The content is generally ok. But the component reference is obviously a
> large beast. I think generally we should aim to include small devices on any
> webpage we provide.

I meant that there is too much useful content to make it worth trying
to read it on a small device.
I did not mean that there is too much content for all devices.

>>
>>> I could hide it there or switch to the banner.html.
>>
>> I don't think it makes sense to use the square logo on the header banner.
>> It wastes space on every page.
>>
>> One could perhaps revert to using banner.html at the bottom of the LHS
>> menu.
>
> That menu gets converted to an top page menu on smaller screen sizes, so  I
> thought that this is not an ideal place either.
>
>>
>> Or even put the square logo in the LHS for small devices and use the
>> rectangular logo in the main heading for larger devices.
>
> I have made the twitter div to use one line on smaller devices and snuggle
> the wide ad below that. We waste a bit space on small devices now, but I
> think, that is not a problem, since users will have to scroll anyway.

I think there's still a slight issue with the balance of the page on
normal devices.

The LHS menu font looks too big to me in comparison with the body text.


> Regards
>  Felix
>
>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> It's not worth spending time worrying about making the site look good
>> on smaller displays.
>>
>>>>> Modified:
>>>>>       jmeter/trunk/xdocs/css/new-style.css
>>>>>
>>>>> Modified: jmeter/trunk/xdocs/css/new-style.css
>>>>> URL:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/jmeter/trunk/xdocs/css/new-style.css?rev=1664885&r1=1664884&r2=1664885&view=diff
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>>> --- jmeter/trunk/xdocs/css/new-style.css (original)
>>>>> +++ jmeter/trunk/xdocs/css/new-style.css Sat Mar  7 16:24:00 2015
>>>>> @@ -70,7 +70,11 @@ h1, h2, h3, h4, h5, .title {
>>>>>
>>>>>    .banner>iframe {
>>>>>      width: 140px;
>>>>> -  height: 140px;
>>>>> +  height: 130px;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +.banner>iframe>body {
>>>>> +  margin: 0px;
>>>>> +  padding: 0px;
>>>>>    }
>>>>>
>>>>>    body {
>>>>>
>>>>>
>

Mime
View raw message