From dev-return-3921-apmail-jmeter-dev-archive=jmeter.apache.org@jmeter.apache.org Thu Feb 19 22:53:54 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0559D17753 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58296 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2015 22:53:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 58267 invoked by uid 500); 19 Feb 2015 22:53:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 58255 invoked by uid 99); 19 Feb 2015 22:53:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:53:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of philippe.mouawad@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.169] (HELO mail-yk0-f169.google.com) (209.85.160.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 22:53:49 +0000 Received: by mail-yk0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 79so5514084ykr.0 for ; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:53:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=D48DLAMJXeJLx5nHISkwLDERNyC/X2IO81NX0JK1bcg=; b=RCCTkwskFKjg91HGNVouxFd3uWAjmlZyXRAEfX/sj6YT7mIfN0pGz0zHjZsqWbybUQ Ea1PhvBNRrvJadJdyTcuujMGEfG/4AKfvm+S2qjFSSmOAIwGQ2jvynkGOUeLgdH43gDB eG8EJHluOShaXuQ1r5nMCmCCJLR0m2kzS8GNV1T52cmJ5XNrJrJVjrfwuIrX8IUtbXja yyIGNWAt+Q9enHe+F7qbIxvqtAp5/8k4I8uSoIDWbKnsE1ddGc+9gEdNXNHWLq0+fvAo E14PE6WZrForf3yhUQFg3T61nxLKv0AlH7IGVwkHbFTS951qwIcqnxmd3xXRSUTX2ExV CUKw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.236.1.38 with SMTP id 26mr4631340yhc.163.1424386409087; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:53:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.170.168.67 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Feb 2015 14:53:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <54C3F8ED.3010106@internetallee.de> <54C4F99E.5060706@apache.org> <54C50EEE.6070003@ya.ru> <54CB66B0.90107@ya.ru> Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2015 23:53:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Release 2.13 ? From: Philippe Mouawad To: "dev@jmeter.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1132e9caefca6d050f78cd35 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1132e9caefca6d050f78cd35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi, I fixed what seemed urgent, remaining work (html report) will require much more time. So if we want to release we could start. Regarding changes.xml I suggest to change order: - New and noteworthy - Improvements - Bugs - Thanks - Known issues As when you read them today, you see bugs before while enhancement are usually what makes a product nice. Known bugs are at the begining, I find personnaly that it may give a bad idea of jmeter while almost all of them are due to jdk bugs on some systems. Regards On Friday, January 30, 2015, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > Thanks Andrey, > If possible we should fix this one before: > - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57514 > > And I intend to commit a BackendListener client implementation related to > reporting. > See a thread I will start. > > Regards > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:10 PM, Andrey Pokhilko > wrote: > >> I have committed remote retry feature into trunk. Now I have no more >> reasons to delay 2.13 release. Instead, I support it to be out as soon >> as it is possible. >> >> Andrey Pokhilko >> >> On 01/25/2015 07:02 PM, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >> > +1 for inclusion (will reconsider once PR is available :-) ) >> > Regards >> > >> > On Sunday, January 25, 2015, Andrey Pokhilko > > wrote: >> > >> >> Ah, I forgot one thing that I wanted to commit in 2.13: remote retry >> >> feature. >> >> >> >> It is needed when you run distributed test with tens of slaves and some >> >> of them fail because of network glitches or other reasons. >> >> >> >> May I do that before starting release process for 2.13? As usual, I'll >> >> show it as GitHub PR first for easy review, and there will be bugzilla >> >> with explanation. >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Andrey Pokhilko >> >> >> >> On 01/25/2015 05:11 PM, Milamber wrote: >> >>> Hello, >> >>> >> >>> +1 for me to release a 2.13 version. (I can act as RM) >> >>> +1 too for a new property to disable RSTA on Logger panel before the >> new >> >>> release. >> >>> >> >>> Milamber >> >>> >> >>> On 25/01/2015 00:20, sebb wrote: >> >>>> OK to name it 2.13 and to release it. >> >>>> >> >>>> Given that there have been some issues with using RSyntaxTextArea, I >> >>>> wonder whether what it provides for the LoggerPanel is worth the >> >>>> potential disadvantages. >> >>>> >> >>>> I have just had a look at the display, and I'm not sure it provides >> >>>> much apart from line numbering.. >> >>>> >> >>>> I can see that RSTA is beneficial for the GUI fields, but these are >> >>>> generally quite small, whereas the logging panel can grow without >> >>>> bound. >> >>>> >> >>>> At the moment the user has no choice as to whether to use it. >> >>>> >> >>>> Rather than release 2.13 and hope that the issues have been solved, I >> >>>> think it would be better to at least provide the option to disable >> >>>> RSTA for the LoggerPanel. This could be done with a property. >> >>>> >> >>>> At least then there would be a work round if RSTA proves problematic. >> >>>> >> >>>> On 24 January 2015 at 19:56, Felix Schumacher >> >>>> > >> > wrote: >> >>>>> Am 24.01.2015 um 16:30 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: >> >>>>> >> >>>>>> Hello, >> >>>>>> It appears 2.12 suffers from an OOM in GUI mode : >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57440 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> This OOM seems to be due to RSyntaxTexarea bug: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> - https://github.com/bobbylight/RSyntaxTextArea/issues/99 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> It appeared after the rework of LoggerPanel#processEvent way of >> >> appending >> >>>>>> event. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Now that it receivs log event even when closed this OOM has more >> >> chances >> >>>>>> to >> >>>>>> appear. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> I reverted to 2.11 way of appending events to fix OOM waiting for >> >> answer >> >>>>>> from rsyntaxtarea project. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> There was also a bug in the way limit=0 was set that had no >> effect, I >> >>>>>> fixed >> >>>>>> it as part of the bug. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> There is a workaround which is to set: >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> - jmeter.loggerpanel.enable_when_closed=false >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> But if user opens panel, OOM will occur if lot of logs occur >> >> (specially if >> >>>>>> stacktraces). >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> If we release, it cannot be named 2.12.1 because we have some >> "big?" >> >>>>>> features in this versions so it would not be a minor one. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Regarding the frequency and impact of this bug, in our company I >> had 2 >> >>>>>> reports in 5 days of this OOM so I think it is not to be ignored. >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> Thoughts ? >> >>>>>> >> >>>>> +1 to release 2.13. I don't think a we should go for 2.x.y. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Regards >> >>>>> Felix >> >> >> >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad. --001a1132e9caefca6d050f78cd35--