jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shmuel Krakower <shmul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Enhancement to be able to ignore DEBUG Sampler in ResultCollector
Date Tue, 25 Mar 2014 07:42:41 GMT
Maybe we can go with simple approach of adding a boolean data member to the
sampler base class of Hidden and all listeners add a piece of code to
ignore those who are marked hidden?

www.beatsoo.org - free application performance monitoring from world wide
locations.
On Mar 25, 2014 1:46 AM, "sebb" <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 24 March 2014 20:16, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 1:46 PM, sebb <sebbaz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There is already a way to drop sampler output from the results - just
> >> return null.
> >>
> >> This is what the Test Sampler does.
> >>
> >> At present it does not look like the scripting samplers can return null.
> >>
> >> The Debug Sampler displays its results via the Listeners, so it's not
> >> possible to use this mechanism to suppress Debug Sampler output.
> >>
> >> Would it make sense to add a property making Debug Sampler return null ?
> > #debug_sampler.silente_mode=false
>
> Yes, but the debug sampler would then do nothing.
>
> >
> >> However, I'm not sure it makes sense to special case the Listener
> >> processing so that some samples get displayed but don't get saved.
> >>
> > In that case what do you propose ?
>
> Not sure.
>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23 March 2014 14:35, Philippe Mouawad <philippe.mouawad@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> > I agree , this would be even better. I have the same requirement for
> >> JSR223
> >> > Samplers.
> >> >
> >> > Regards
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Shmuel Krakower <shmulikk@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> I would suggest to allow ignoring any sampler if user chooses it.
> >> >> For example I use beanshell samplers which I mostly don't wanna
> see...
> >> >>
> >> >> But this may get your implementation comlex...
> >> >>
> >> >> www.beatsoo.org - free application performance monitoring from world
> >> wide
> >> >> locations.
> >> >> On Mar 23, 2014 4:27 PM, "Philippe Mouawad" <
> philippe.mouawad@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Hello,
> >> >> > What do you think about the following enhancement:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    - Be able through a new property to not output DEBUG Sampler
> >> results
> >> >> in
> >> >> >    ResultCollector
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Why:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >    - Because Debug Sampler might affect throughput results and
> error
> >> rate
> >> >> >    positively
> >> >> >    - I use Debug Sampler to have a more readable pause time in
Test
> >> Plan,
> >> >> >    usually when pause time are not the same between samples (I
put
> >> Timer
> >> >> > as a
> >> >> >    child of Debug  Sampler (all properties to false)
> >> >> >    - Because it is DEBUG, why would you need it in final results
?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > --
> >> >> > Regards.
> >> >> > Philippe
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Cordialement.
> >> > Philippe Mouawad.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cordialement.
> > Philippe Mouawad.
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message