Hello,
Web seems ambiguous to me
For example, websocket is/will be web but Proxy cannot record it.
How about:
HTTP(S) Scenario Recorder or HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder.
Regards
Philippe
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Milamber <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Le 11/09/2013 10:42, sebb a ecrit :
>
> On 11 September 2013 09:28, Milamber <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I've prefer keep the word "proxy" in the name.
>>>
>> That's the part I really want to get rid of, because of the potential
>> confusion with the other proxy settings.
>>
> Ok.
> (The word "proxy" means in my mind: "you must configure your browser to
> use this (JMeter) proxy to record your script".)
>
>
>
>
>> "Test" is an ambiguous word, means in my mind "test" (like beta-test).
>>> Word
>>> like "script" seems better.
>>>
>> Well, we use Test already quite a lot, as in Test Element / Test Script.
>>
>> Since JMeter is all about testing, I think using Test is OK.
>>
>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Recorder
>>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Test Recorder
>>> - Web Proxy Recorder
>>> - Web Proxy for Test Recorder
>>> - Web Proxy for Script Recorder
>>> - Web Proxy Script Recorder
>>>
>>>
>>> Web Proxy Recorder is my favorite.
>>>
>>> How about
>>
>> Web Test Script Recorder
>>
>
> +1 to this.
>
>
>
> or
>> Test Script Recorder - HTTP(S)
>> or
>> HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder
>>
>> Le 11/09/2013 09:00, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit :
>>>
>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder would be a good name I think.
>>>> But if we do the change we absolutely need to keep all references to
>>>> JMeter
>>>> Proxy Server as it is referenced on many links and documentations.
>>>>
>>>> Did you have some time to think about summariser enabling ?
>>>>
>>>> Great changes you made sebb !
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, sebb wrote:
>>>>
>>>> The HTTP Proxy Server test element is used to record browser sessions
>>>>> as test plans.
>>>>>
>>>>> The name does not describe its function (it describes the
>>>>> implementation).
>>>>> Having Proxy in the name means it's more easily confused with the
>>>>> proxy settings that may be needed to run tests.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if it would be a good idea to rename the test element to
>>>>> something like
>>>>>
>>>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder
>>>>> or
>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP(S)
>>>>> or
>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP/HTTPS
>>>>>
>>>>> I did consider "Test Recorder" on its own, but that might be taken to
>>>>> imply that it can record other test types (e.g. JDBC), which it cannot
>>>>> at present. Even if we did implement JDBC recording, it would likely
>>>>> need a different GUI as the options would be completely different, so
>>>>> I think the name needs to include HTTP(S).
>>>>>
>>>>> I think the rename will only affect the component reference docs - and
>>>>> we can add an anchor for the old name.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>> Would it help to rename the element?
>>>>>
>>>>> If there is agreement, I'd like to do this before the next release.
>>>>> There are other major changes to the recorder which also need
>>>>> documenting.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
|