Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of D.Lade@bigpoint.net designates
 178.132.246.173 as permitted sender)
From: Danny Lade <D.Lade@bigpoint.net>
To: "dev@jmeter.apache.org" <dev@jmeter.apache.org>
Subject: AW: Groovy
Thread-Topic: Groovy
Thread-Index: 
 AQHOdROt/4nuOqHUOkWEpB6hxBdsBZlOI0IAgAABjgCAA6nEAIAACkCAgAAB+wCAAAZQAIAAa4eAgAATRYCAAEAbMIAA2EyAgAKnApD//+0YgIAALLAA
Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 15:24:29 +0000
Message-ID: <0E1FDD26CD35694FBC52505E30FA0448FAC2FF@srv024038.bigpoint.local>
References: 
 <CAH9fUpb9XET=p3S6-0Px2us9N0BAVEhSUw6S2oqfevAPB3O6Xw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0VZ4onsTmnKSisheUFgqgzofysXKS3MbhGUQW5GpANukKg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH9fUpbR7uRFdBLTVj6-2sKJnuS9haNkP2DnbCBfvpRwpj8mfw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH9fUpZZrhoaf9Xd_J==m02vneTMj0yX2CCL6yv4J_4iyiry9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0VYeeYQt9zTwPdBNVovpsVrZnBFkE6kzAyrzkBoFU3680A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH9fUpafdH2Z63XcC9o_qAC6i7ESXysvzJuYYr7TdqS94+-s4Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAOGo0Vaty8Y5PK1h2crAytU=1dA5aDY6=YDn=Bw-VxqnmNzWKA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHnoMfoVCKV9K7sLwR05jowF+2qtf2pFNtkUQRRnMyD3aZ1CpA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAH9fUpaTpd+c4z8rHv0kKktH01TwwxTg4xTxawf1+3724Qg3Hg@mail.gmail.com>
	<0E1FDD26CD35694FBC52505E30FA0448FABC12@srv024038.bigpoint.local>
	<CAOGo0Vb2QB09cvHOo9MhTX5Jv4UBzerSV=QvDK_=5ZE8NkM=MQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<0E1FDD26CD35694FBC52505E30FA0448FAC2A1@srv024038.bigpoint.local>
 <CAOGo0VZehb92wqKLNvx7CVBhfcjbOQM--nCnq1T_QVpyqMMOog@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAOGo0VZehb92wqKLNvx7CVBhfcjbOQM--nCnq1T_QVpyqMMOog@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: sebb [mailto:sebbaz@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 5. Juli 2013 16:29
> An: dev@jmeter.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Groovy
>=20
> > I'm not sure how could you know the code about JSR223TestElement is
> > implementing the support for "script compilation caching", so here come=
s
> some short code:
> >
> > processFileOrScript()
> >         // Hack as in bsh-2.0b5.jar BshScriptEngine implements Compilab=
le but
> throws new Error
> >         boolean supportsCompilable =3D scriptEngine instanceof Compilab=
le
> >                 &&
> > !(scriptEngine.getClass().getName().equals("bsh.engine.BshScriptEngine
> > "));
> >
> > Because the JavaScriptEngine is based on the BshScriptEngine the "scrip=
t
> compilation caching"
> > isn't available for Java, but it is available for groovy.
>=20
> Which JavaScriptEngine?
>=20
There is no physical implementation, but if you use the "JSR223 Sampler" it=
 provides the language "Java". This is made via the BshScriptEngineFactory =
which provides the information it also "speaks" Java.
(see https://code.google.com/p/beanshell2/source/browse/trunk/src/bsh/BshSc=
riptEngineFactory.java?r=3D94)
However, the "script compilation caching" does not work for Java (provided =
by BshScriptEngine).

Besides that, it seems they removed the Java support in newer versions (see=
 same link, but newest version). You should consider that if you think abou=
t using "bsh-2.1b5.jar" in the future.

> > I'm not saying "you must install groovy" , I just want to be sure
> > having a scripting engine with "script compilation caching" working (or=
 without
> any synchronization during runtime).
>=20
> What I am saying is that there is no need to include Groovy in the JMeter=
 binary
> release.
> It works just as well if it is downloaded separately.
>=20
> And if the BSH Compilable bug can be fixed, users could then use BeanShel=
l.
>=20
It's the same on me, I just want to point out the "script compilation cachi=
ng" with BeanShell.
All I did was to suggest possible solutions (IMO), the decision is all your=
s.

Greetings Danny