jmeter-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From sebb <seb...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release JMeter 2.9 RC3
Date Mon, 28 Jan 2013 11:27:31 GMT
On 28 January 2013 08:00, Rainer Jung <rainer.jung@kippdata.de> wrote:
> On 28.01.2013 02:51, sebb wrote:
>> On 27 January 2013 22:13, Milamber <milamber@apache.org> wrote:
>>> To do this, I suppose, I must change the svnmucc script (updatesite.txt)?
>>> ====
>>> rm
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/site
>>>
>>> cp
>>> HEAD
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/branches/docs-2.9/docs
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/site
>>> ====
>>>
>>> by
>>> ====
>>> rm
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/site
>>>
>>> cp
>>> HEAD
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/trunk/docs
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jmeter/site
>>> ====
>>>
>>
>> No, we don't copy site from trunk
>>
>> Normally bugs are found in the docs some while after release, by which
>> time trunk docs has moved on, possibly incompatibly.
>>
>> So the idea was that branches/docs-m.n/docs should be copied from
>> trunk at release, and then changes for the website get made to the
>> branches copy (and to trunk if appropriate).
>
> Just in case it wasn't clear: the site in svn is just an svn tree as
> everything else. AFAIK svnmucc is only used to populate it from the
> branch docs in a simple way.

Yes.

We use svnmucc for two reasons:
- performs the update in a single transaction, so the site is not left
partially updated
- generates much less output

> So if there is a need to adjust specific site pages, you could also
> check out the site, edit the page and commit.

Ys, but not recommended.

> If you want to keep the site consistent with the branch - which is a
> good idea - then you can either edit the branch, commit it and then
> merge to site or instead of merge like above "rm" and "cp" the branch to
> site.

Using svn rather than svnmucc is not recommended, see above.

> At least that's what I got out of the above recipe.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer

Mime
View raw message