Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 216489FBF for ; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 15:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 70117 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2012 15:12:44 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-jmeter-dev-archive@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 70073 invoked by uid 500); 8 Apr 2012 15:12:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@jmeter.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@jmeter.apache.org Received: (qmail 70065 invoked by uid 99); 8 Apr 2012 15:12:43 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:12:43 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of sebbaz@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.171 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.171] (HELO mail-ob0-f171.google.com) (209.85.214.171) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 15:12:37 +0000 Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so5943600obb.2 for ; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:12:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=zt5C0G1XlEdxjlmwHLoESPQPkuOSNTcUuHLhEJJqunc=; b=vtqjdgXuZVvA/a/mU4vzV4WZHf+Ek3b07gJqY7cUsFm96tYDWJOF89xb48pMWD3kV/ asuiT5MudTpgx20mAdBMeHxsy4GiyG9AQwezPlsPXLGkRX1PuXCsEYAZVGaT0yHctNM7 4g0LUV1pHoVSy3z7XEtQhHqWOeoDzVekVHMUaVDSD6Ua65m3ahxEMa1mG7zn962v57Xb 29rVhvjiA4VJJqV/FjIxMfMn6q4wS/e0WFs4Gxt3Nq27T9UM0E9y9W+5K6BZDQQWasHq XAwJU3wwF723QUjz/Y9reasq2Nx/c4LBLyzMs/JbO2pKlBmHum+tu/eJVJmH9TDNan1Z aeUA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.51.73 with SMTP id i9mr6160843obo.17.1333897936536; Sun, 08 Apr 2012 08:12:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.225.99 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Apr 2012 08:12:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4F7F5D9B.2080003@apache.org> References: <4F4A802C.3060801@kippdata.de> <4F7F5D9B.2080003@apache.org> Date: Sun, 8 Apr 2012 16:12:16 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Moving to Java 1.6 for a future JMeter release? From: sebb To: dev@jmeter.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 6 April 2012 22:18, Milamber wrote: > Hello, > > No conclusion for move JMeter on target Java 1.6? > > With 4 votes "+", I thinks we can start to use Java 1.6 API ? The +1 votes aren't relevant here; however the lack of -1 votes is relevant. Since there have been no objections to the move to 1.6, we can start using it when it becomes necessary to do so. > Milamber > > Le 26/02/2012 18:55, Rainer Jung a ecrit : >> On 26.02.2012 01:33, sebb wrote: >>> JMeter currently targets Java 1.5 (but will of course run on Java 1.6+). >>> >>> At some point it might be useful to require Java 1.6 as the minimum >>> version, as it does offer some useful enhancements. >>> >>> Would requiring Java 1.6 cause a problem for any JMeter users? >>> >>> It seems unlikely, as JMeter should be run on a different host from >>> the system under test; i.e. the change won't require a change to >>> existing applications. >>> >>> But if there are good reasons why JMeter should stick with Java 1.5 >>> rather than moving to Java 1.6, please let us know. >> >> +1 for 1.6. >> >> Rainer >> >