Return-Path: 
 <jena-users-return-26-apmail-incubator-jena-users-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jena-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 99849 invoked from network); 10 Dec 2010 15:53:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 10 Dec 2010 15:53:04 -0000
Received: (qmail 47521 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 15:53:04 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-jena-users-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47496 invoked by uid 500); 10 Dec 2010 15:53:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact jena-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:jena-users-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:jena-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:jena-users@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <jena-users.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: jena-users@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list jena-users@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 47484 invoked by uid 99); 10 Dec 2010 15:53:03 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:53:03 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bimargulies@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.215.170 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.215.170] (HELO mail-ey0-f170.google.com)
 (209.85.215.170)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 15:52:55 +0000
Received: by eyf5 with SMTP id 5so2513144eyf.1
        for <jena-users@incubator.apache.org>;
 Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:52:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=zs5+jU2yqDkWnH62xIwSx/bfJqpoDY4bJVhNImCVOdQ=;
        b=h0dbIqaIegU0rMt397CYSzEuGnWz/BsIblDjU1IsxnSGxdbprOITIaCc270ddaTlsf
         vQVDWqpvQzzwRUc7AFjeYFuOVVY1xvttQc/sQTJMUStVLK4TP59GXAwRg066AxtO9vQq
         5oqFfTG5n/3YznFZ4Ywrsf9JNLKWU1IXahUV8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=bVqBqgC5++sj1fj5rznbLiX7DZXYznA1BfxriU16tim1UzufX9aNv7OENgf4XWVHbv
         kaKbGVNMtun28+7u6utOfIkg42445v/Z6um7tNTxpu7DeZ2hHE7RkAAgJ7xBL3K29QOc
         0oG3WMvKdFqajwwqbZFaTXfWNsjnuMrERq3Hk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.204.118.138 with SMTP id v10mr920170bkq.94.1291996355329; Fri,
 10 Dec 2010 07:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.204.45.66 with HTTP; Fri, 10 Dec 2010 07:52:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 10:52:35 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTinBytmGjUQUTqXYip0Zui2UMcNUhhL_J6OcaKs8@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: TDB versus arq and jena versions
From: Benson Margulies <bimargulies@gmail.com>
To: jena-users@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

Does TDB 0.8.7 not get along with arq 2.8.6? The pom in the package
cries out for 2.8.7-RC-2 of arq and 2.6.4-RC-1, and those aren't on
central.

testVerySimpleQuery(com.basistech.jug.rdfdb.SimpleRoundTripTest)  Time
elapsed: 0.81 sec  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: com/hp/hpl/jena/sparql/modify/UpdateVisitor
	at com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.TDB.initialization1(TDB.java:203)
	at com.hp.hpl.jena.tdb.TDB.<clinit>(TDB.java:186)
	at com.basistech.jug.rdfdb.jena.JenaStore.initialize(JenaStore.java:59)