jena-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Hoping for smaller turtle(s)
Date Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:36:35 GMT
Note that the goal here is to persuade the Turtle writer to make small
Turtles from a model.

On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ian's correct - the local part can't start with a digit. It's part of the
> turtle space.
>
> In terms of writing Turtle by hand:
>
> @base  <uri:jug:001f469cc17412da1ce53fa1f9b67481> .
>
> <#12>
>      a       rex:Organization ;
>      ...
>
> works but the writer isn't clever enough to use a base in the file (@base
> does not survive parsing).  If you write it with that base, it might work.
>
>
> In design terms, it's a completely unnessary restriction.  It's not a XML
> QNAME or related to it any more.
>
> Long version:
> http://seaborne.blogspot.com/2010/06/standardising-rdf-syntaxes.html
>
> SPARQL does not have this restriction because the last working group got
> pushback not to follow Turtle exactly here, especially from communities
> using URNs generated from existing systems ....
>
> Hopefully, the next RDF WG will do the right thing.
>
>        Andy
>
> On 26/12/10 18:08, Ian Dickinson wrote:
>>
>> I should have added:
>>
>>> blob:12
>>> probably won't parse as you expect
>>
>> and therefore the writer is smart enough not to generate it.
>>
>> Ian
>

Mime
View raw message