jena-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Hoping for smaller turtle(s)
Date Sun, 26 Dec 2010 18:50:33 GMT
GZIP is next after fixing the URIs.

Also, I have some literals that are long and come around over and
over, so factoring them out to their own triples is on the agenda.


On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Andy Seaborne
<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
> Write to a gzip'ed stream?
>
>        Andy
>
> On 26/12/10 18:36, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Note that the goal here is to persuade the Turtle writer to make small
>> Turtles from a model.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Andy Seaborne<andy.seaborne@gmail.com>
>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> Ian's correct - the local part can't start with a digit. It's part of the
>>> turtle space.
>>>
>>> In terms of writing Turtle by hand:
>>>
>>> @base<uri:jug:001f469cc17412da1ce53fa1f9b67481>  .
>>>
>>> <#12>
>>>      a       rex:Organization ;
>>>      ...
>>>
>>> works but the writer isn't clever enough to use a base in the file (@base
>>> does not survive parsing).  If you write it with that base, it might
>>> work.
>>>
>>>
>>> In design terms, it's a completely unnessary restriction.  It's not a XML
>>> QNAME or related to it any more.
>>>
>>> Long version:
>>> http://seaborne.blogspot.com/2010/06/standardising-rdf-syntaxes.html
>>>
>>> SPARQL does not have this restriction because the last working group got
>>> pushback not to follow Turtle exactly here, especially from communities
>>> using URNs generated from existing systems ....
>>>
>>> Hopefully, the next RDF WG will do the right thing.
>>>
>>>        Andy
>>>
>>> On 26/12/10 18:08, Ian Dickinson wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I should have added:
>>>>
>>>>> blob:12
>>>>> probably won't parse as you expect
>>>>
>>>> and therefore the writer is smart enough not to generate it.
>>>>
>>>> Ian
>>>
>

Mime
View raw message