jena-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: sparql versus ^^ types
Date Fri, 10 Dec 2010 17:05:45 GMT
I'm going to ditch all the types. I don't have any reason for them.

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Andy Seaborne
<andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/12/10 16:39, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Protege persuaded me to put types in my Ontology. So (as viewed by
>> tdbdump), I have quads like:
>>
>> <urn:basistech.com:analysis#9>
>> <http://www.basistech.com/ontologies/2010/6/rex.owl#hasOriginalText>
>> "Fredrick Chopin"^^<http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string>
>> <urn:misc-test>  .
>>
>> should the following sparql match that?
>>
>> SELECT ?x where { ?x
>> <http://www.basistech.com/ontologies/2010/6/rex.owl#hasOriginalText>
>> "Fredrick Chopin" }
>
> Not in TDB.  Simple literals (plain literals without language tag) do not
> match xsd:string.
>
> SELECT ?x where { ?x
>   <http://www.basistech.com/ontologies/2010/6/rex.owl#hasOriginalText>
>   "Fredrick Chopin"^^xsd:string
> }
>
> TDB could canonicalise the input to make "" and ""^^xsd:string the same.
>
>        Andy
>

Mime
View raw message