jena-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Benson Margulies <bimargul...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Hoping for smaller turtle(s)
Date Sun, 26 Dec 2010 20:48:06 GMT
You might like XML better if you parsed it with woodstox, let alone
used the FIS representation.



On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 26/12/10 19:17, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>
>> Meanwhile, did you see my message about FastInfoset? Hypothetically,
>> XML+FastInfoset might prove convenient this "I need to move a lot of
>> RDF around."
>
> Could do - interesting experiment to do.  Adding new readers/writers is
> possible (but tricky currently - work-in-progress).
>
> The fastest and most scalable way to deal with RDF is usually to print and
> load as N-triples. Compressed N-Triples is typically x8.
>
> The pretty printing Turtle is slow because it has to analysis the model for
> structures and track all statements written.  N-triples just raw writes the
> DB.  It does not scale to very large models.
>
> XML has proven costly to parse - N-triples is really close to just byte
> shifting.
>
> TDB loads fastest from .nt or .nt.gz (or .nq and .nq.gz).
>
>        Andy
>

Mime
View raw message